Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Beyond complete myocardial revascularization: is it important and does it matter?

Michael Nathanson1, Kai Ihnken

  • 1Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, San Jose, CA 95128, USA. mnathanson@scvmc.org

Journal of Cardiac Surgery
|April 17, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Maximizing coronary artery bypass grafts beyond one per system is not supported by evidence for long-term freedom from adverse events. Current literature lacks detailed analysis of graft number versus outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accurate Force Fields for Atomistic Simulations of Oxides, Hydroxides, and Organic Hybrid Materials up to the Micrometer Scale.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2023
Same author

A Rare Case of Carcinoid Constrictive Pericarditis.

JACC. Case reports·2021
Same author

Case report: recurrent metastatic breast cancer in internal mammary dissection bed discovered at the time of coronary bypass.

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery·2019
Same author

Observing crystal nucleation in four dimensions using atomic electron tomography.

Nature·2019
Same author

Atomic-Scale Structure and Stress Release Mechanism in Core-Shell Nanoparticles.

ACS nano·2018
Same author

Single-shot 3D coherent diffractive imaging of core-shell nanoparticles with elemental specificity.

Scientific reports·2018

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Vascular Biology

Background:

  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common treatment for coronary artery disease.
  • The practice of performing multiple grafts per coronary system (left anterior descending, circumflex, right) has been prevalent, aiming for long-term freedom from major adverse coronary events.
  • However, the scientific literature lacks robust documentation supporting the necessity of maximizing bypass grafts beyond one per system.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the evidence supporting the practice of maximizing the number of coronary artery bypass grafts per system.
  • To identify limitations in existing literature regarding graft number and clinical outcomes.
  • To highlight the need for detailed analysis of revascularization strategies based on coronary anatomy.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing medical and surgical literature on coronary artery bypass grafting.
  • Analysis of published series regarding patient cohorts, follow-up duration, and clinical endpoints.
  • Identification of gaps in studies stratifying outcomes by detailed coronary vessel anatomopathologic inventory and revascularization strategy.

Main Results:

  • The medical and surgical literature does not adequately document the importance of maximizing coronary artery bypass grafts beyond one per system.
  • Published studies show significant variation in patient populations, follow-up periods, and the range of clinical endpoints assessed.
  • No published series provide subset stratification analysis linking detailed coronary vessel pathology to revascularization strategy and outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The presumed benefit of maximizing coronary artery bypass grafts per system is not well-supported by current evidence.
  • Existing literature is limited by heterogeneity and a lack of comprehensive endpoint analysis.
  • Further research is needed to analyze revascularization strategies based on detailed coronary anatomy and patient-specific factors.