Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Bio-terrorism, bio-defense, bioethics].

Miguel Kottow1

  • 1Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile. kattow@hotmail.com

Cadernos De Saude Publica
|April 18, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vulnerability in Research Ethics?

Bioethics·2026
Same author

Conscientious objection in medicine: Experience in Chile.

Developing world bioethics·2020
Same author

Is it wise to censor the censorable?

Developing world bioethics·2020
Same author

Intergenerational healthcare inequities in developing countries.

Developing world bioethics·2019
Same author

[Reinforcing protection of Research Ethics Committees].

Revista medica de Chile·2018
Same author

[Informed consent in clinical practice: persistent doubts].

Revista medica de Chile·2017

Following 9/11, public health resources increased but were tied to military goals, creating ethical conflicts. This funding shift neglected essential public health services, exacerbating existing inequities.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Biosecurity
  • Bioethics

Context:

  • Post-9/11 era heightened concerns over biological weapon threats.
  • Increased resource allocation for biodefense and offensive capabilities.
  • Public health sector integrated into national security strategies.

Purpose:

  • To analyze the impact of post-9/11 biosecurity measures on public health.
  • To examine the ethical implications of military-driven public health initiatives.
  • To assess the consequences for traditional public health funding and equity.

Summary:

  • Terrorist attacks spurred investment in biological weapon defense, involving public health.
  • Public health participation in military strategies presents ethical dilemmas, conflicting with core health protection principles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Funding for public health became contingent on military applications, diverting resources from essential services and worsening allocation disparities.

    • Impact:

    • Highlights the ethical tension between public health's role and military objectives.
    • Reveals how biosecurity funding can undermine equitable and adequate public health infrastructure.
    • Underscores the need for independent, non-militarized public health funding and priorities.