Appraisal of existing methodology in aspiration toxicity testing

New methods or modifications of currently used methods in aspiration toxicology must be capable of accurately assessing the hazard and toxicity potentials of those products which are capable of being aspirated. The methods evaluated in the rat were intratracheal injections,intravenous injections, and modifications of the Gerarde technique. A product containing petroleum distillates and a standard viscosity petroleum distillate sample were administered to Osborne-Mendel rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs in ml/kg doses. The utility of the methods was determined by comparing lung weight increases, lung-body weight ratios, gross pathological lung changes, and mortality. The modified Gerarde technique showed the best potential for predicting aspiration hazard and toxicity based on the severity of the reactions which, using a radiolabeled oil, was shown to be a function of the amount of product which enters and reacts with the lungs. The influence of preventing the swallowing reflex to assure aspiration of the oil was assessed in the rat. The results show that less than 10% of the dose is aspirated when the swallowing reflex occurs. Methods of sacrifice were investigated for an effect on rat lung weight. No tested method except stunning with cervical dislocation produced an effect. Tests were conducted on rats and rabbits to determine differences in lung reactivity to the influence of inhalation anesthetics, pentothal sodium, or no anesthesia in response to petroleum distillate administration and to determine which test species is the better animal model. The resuls indicate that the rat is the better test model because of degree of lung reaction, size, and economy, and that inhalation anesthesia with ether is preferable over the other choices.