Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[LISS versus condylar plate].

U Hahn1, A Prokop, A Jubel

  • 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität zu Köln, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 9, 50924 Köln. ulrich.hahn@uni-koeln.de

Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft Fur Chirurgie. Kongress
|April 23, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Internal Otic Region of Oromerycids (Artiodactyla, Oromerycidae), Early Camelids (Artiodactyla, Camelidae), and the Vicuña (Artiodactyla, Camelidae), Including Notes on Intraspecific and Subadult Ontogenetic Variation.

Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Study of the ^{22}Mg Waiting Point Relevant for X-Ray Burst Nucleosynthesis via the ^{22}Mg(α,p)^{25}Al Reaction.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Retraction.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

Stellar ^{36,38}Ar(n,γ)^{37,39}Ar Reactions and Their Effect on Light Neutron-Rich Nuclide Synthesis.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie·2018
Same author

Study of the ^{26}Al^{m}(d,p)^{27}Al Reaction and the Influence of the ^{26}Al 0^{+} Isomer on the Destruction of ^{26}Al in the Galaxy.

Physical review letters·2017
Same journal

[120th Congress of the German Surgical Society. 29 April-2 May 2003, Munich, Germany. Abstracts].

Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress·2004
Same journal

[Quality and economy--contradictory demands].

Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress·2003
Same journal

[Attractive work schedules--the Sinsheim model].

Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress·2003
Same journal

[Women research personnel also in advanced positions and how do women promote women in this manner?].

Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress·2003
Same journal

[Is surgery a male specialty?--Discussion of bias].

Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress·2003
Same journal

[Integrated clinical guidelines].

Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress·2003
See all related articles

Surgical treatment for distal femoral fractures has improved significantly. While both Condylar Blade Plate and Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) show comparable functional results, LISS offers mechanical and biological advantages.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Traumatology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Surgical treatment of distal femoral fractures was historically challenging with high complication rates.
  • Conservative treatment was often recommended before advancements in implants and techniques.
  • Current standards favor primary surgical intervention for these fractures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical outcomes of Condylar Blade Plate (CBP) versus Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) for distal femoral fractures.
  • To evaluate the efficacy and advantages of LISS in treating these complex fractures.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 121 distal femoral fractures treated between 1986 and 2001.
  • 32 cases treated with CBP, 10 cases treated with LISS.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Neer's system used for evaluating CBP outcomes; averaged follow-up of 9 years.
  • Main Results:

    • LISS demonstrated low postoperative infection rates and 75% excellent/satisfactory results, with cost-effectiveness.
    • No significant functional differences were observed between LISS and CBP groups in this series.
    • LISS required fewer autologous bone grafts compared to CBP.

    Conclusions:

    • LISS offers mechanical and biological advantages over CBP due to its angle-stable screws and Internal Fixator Principle.
    • LISS is a viable and potentially superior option for surgical treatment of distal femoral fractures.
    • Further research may explore long-term outcomes and specific indications for LISS.