Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Evaluating scar development with objective computer-assisted viscoelastic measurement].

H O Rennekampff1, J Rabbels, M Pfau

  • 1Klinik für Hand, Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Verbrennungschirurgie, BG-Unfallklinik, Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstrasse 95, 72076 Tübingen.

Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft Fur Chirurgie. Kongress
|April 23, 2003
PubMed
Summary

This study compared subjective scar assessments using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) with objective viscoelastic measurements. Results showed VSS scores differed significantly from normal skin, but objective measurements were near normal, indicating a disconnect.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

REACT-PXE: a consensus on diagnosis and future research concerning pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE).

Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2026
Same author

Does patient load affect clinical outcome of burn patients in specialized centers? An analysis of the German Burn Registry.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2022
Same author

Wireless microcurrent stimulation improves blood flow in burn wounds.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2021
Same author

Theoretical basis for optimal surgical incision planning to reduce hypertrophic scar formation.

Medical hypotheses·2020
Same author

[Bilateral multifocal pigment epithelial detachments associated with inhaled corticosteroids].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2019
Same author

Corrigendum to ``Patient-rated long-term results after complete denervation of the wrist'' [Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery Volume 71 Issue 1 (2018) 57-61].

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2018

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Wound Healing Research

Background:

  • Scar assessment often relies on subjective scales like the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS).
  • Objective methods for evaluating scar tissue properties, such as viscoelasticity, offer a complementary approach.
  • Different wound dressings may influence scar development and tissue properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare subjective scar assessment using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) with objective viscoelastic measurements.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of different dressings (vaseline gauze, biobrane, occlusive) on scar properties.
  • To investigate the correlation between subjective VSS ratings and objective viscoelastic measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study design.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Donor sites from the thigh were evaluated 0.5 years postoperatively.
  • Subjective scar assessment using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS).
  • Objective viscoelastic measurements using the Cutometer (Courage and Khazaka).
  • Main Results:

    • Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) ratings for donor sites showed significant differences compared to normal skin (F: 2.74, B: 4.25, O: 2.57).
    • Objective viscoelastic measurements by the Cutometer indicated tissue properties near normal compared to uninjured skin.
    • No significant correlation was found between the VSS pliability subscale and Cutometer readings.

    Conclusions:

    • Subjective scar assessment via VSS may not fully reflect objective tissue viscoelastic properties.
    • Objective viscoelastic measurements provide a different perspective on scar healing compared to subjective scales.
    • Further research is needed to reconcile subjective and objective scar evaluation methods.