Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Techniques for quantifying coronary artery calcification.

Jeffrey Girshman1, Steven D Wolff

  • 1Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MR
|April 24, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex differences in pre- and post-surgical left ventricular remodelling and outcomes in primary mitral regurgitation.

European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging·2025
Same author

Controversies in the Management of Mesonephric and Mesonephric-Like Adenocarcinomas of the Female Genital Tract.

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society·2025
Same author

Basket study of oral progesterone antagonist onapristone extended-release in combination with anastrozole in progesterone receptor-positive recurrent adult-type granulosa cell tumor of the ovary.

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society·2025
Same author

The relationship between symptoms and regurgitant severity in primary mitral regurgitation: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

The international journal of cardiovascular imaging·2024
Same author

Basket study of oral progesterone antagonist onapristone extended release in progesterone receptor-positive recurrent granulosa cell, low-grade serous ovarian cancer, or endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Gynecologic oncology·2024
Same author

Body mass index and adiposity influence responses to immune checkpoint inhibition in endometrial cancer.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2024
Same journal

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of cervix: Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Pathology, and Advanced Imaging Modalities.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR·2026
Same journal

Ultrasound in Pulmonary Embolism: A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Hotspots (1978-2025).

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR·2026
Same journal

Transformative Role of Advanced Neural Computation in Clinical Image Diagnostics: A Review of Key Concepts and Applications.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR·2026
Same journal

Clinical Applications of High-Frequency Ultrasound (HFUS) in Filler Identification and Complication Management.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR·2026
Same journal

Imaging of Adrenal and Extra-Adrenal Paraganglioma.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR·2026
Same journal

Greater, lesser and third occipital nerve entrapment: Sonographic anatomy and imaging.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR·2026
See all related articles

Coronary calcium scoring (CAC) helps identify atherosclerosis risk. This review examines CAC quantification methods and factors influencing score accuracy for better patient management.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) screening increasingly uses coronary calcium scoring.
  • Coronary calcium (CAC) is a recognized marker for atherosclerosis, but its individual significance and impact on management remain debated.
  • Interpreting serial changes in CAC scores also presents challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review algorithms and techniques for quantifying coronary calcium (CAC).
  • To identify variables that significantly affect CAC score derivation.
  • To address the need for accurate and reproducible CAC quantification in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing algorithms and techniques for CAC quantification.
  • Analysis of factors influencing CAC score accuracy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the clinical implications of CAC quantification methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Widespread agreement on CAC as a population marker for atherosclerosis.
    • Disagreement on the clinical significance of individual CAC scores for patient management.
    • Identification of variables impacting CAC quantification accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate and reproducible CAC quantification is crucial for interpreting individual scores and guiding patient management.
    • Further research and standardization of CAC quantification methods are needed.
    • Addressing the identified variables can improve the clinical utility of CAC scoring.