Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are more items identified than can be reported?

R E Graves

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory
    |March 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Visual processing models debate whether identification or memory limits performance. This study found memory limits visual report accuracy, supporting models where memory is integral to identification.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Testing vs. Believing Hypotheses: Magical Ideation in the Judgement of Contingencies.

    Cognitive neuropsychiatry·2014
    Same author

    Boston naming test short forms: a comparison of previous forms with new item response theory based forms.

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2005
    Same author

    Correcting the 3MS for bias does not improve accuracy when screening for cognitive impairment or dementia.

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2005
    Same author

    Loose but normal: a semantic association study.

    Journal of psycholinguistic research·2001
    Same author

    Accuracy of regression equation prediction across the range of estimated premorbid IQ.

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2000
    Same author

    Visual localization in dyslexia.

    Neuropsychology·1999
    Same journal

    Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory·1981
    Same journal

    Tachistoscopic simulations of eye fixations on pictures.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory·1981
    Same journal

    The effects of fading procedures on discrimination shifts.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory·1981
    Same journal

    The representation of pictures in memory.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory·1981
    Same journal

    Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory·1981
    Same journal

    Multiple code activation in word recognition: evidence from rhyme monitoring.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory·1981
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Visual Information Processing
    • Human Memory

    Background:

    • The capacity of visual information processing is limited, with subjects typically recalling only about four items from a larger array presented tachistoscopically (full-report span).
    • Current models diverge on whether visual processing limitations stem from item identification or short-term memory capacity.
    • Previous research suggested identification capacity might exceed the full-report span, implying memory as the primary bottleneck.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the interplay between item identification and memory limitations in visual information processing.
    • To differentiate between identification-limited and memory-limited models of visual report.
    • To determine the role of memory in visual span tasks, particularly when positional information is considered.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    • Experiment 1 employed a memory-probe method without requiring positional recall to assess item identification capacity.
    • Experiment 2 assessed item identification with correct positional recall.
    • Both experiments utilized tachistoscopic presentation of multi-item arrays.

    Main Results:

    • When positional information was not required (Experiment 1), the number of identified items did not exceed post-iconic memory capacity.
    • When correct positional information was required (Experiment 2), the number of identified items did not surpass the full-report span capacity.
    • These findings challenge the notion that identification capacity alone exceeds report limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • The results support models where memory is intrinsically involved in the identification process or acts as a distinct subsequent stage.
    • Visual report limitations appear to be constrained by memory rather than solely by identification capabilities.
    • This research clarifies the role of memory in visual span and identification tasks.