Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improving information systems in Europe: EURETHNET.

Heiner Fangerau1, Alfred Simon, Claudia Wiesemann

  • 1Department for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Göttingen, Germany.

Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy
|April 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reform of care for people with mental illness in two German states before reunification: An oral history approach.

History of psychiatry·2026
Same author

Talking to migrant children and adolescents with cancer: development of a multimodal skills training in migrant-sensitive communication for paediatric oncologists.

European journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

[Assisted suicide in Germany-initial analysis of data from a reporting platform and potential implications for the development of a guideline].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2026
Same author

No ethics in the Cass Review: could this be justified?

Journal of medical ethics·2025
Same author

Pioneers of modern brain research-Cécile and Oskar Vogt and the Nobel Prize.

Frontiers in neuroanatomy·2025
Same author

Implementing clinical ethics support services in psychiatry: A qualitative study.

Nursing ethics·2025
Same journal

The moral significance of moral distress.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same journal

A defense of empathy: Edith Stein, nursing, and prisoner/patients.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Should we be testing pregnant patients' urine for drugs? An applied ethics approach.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Taking the Right to Die Seriously.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Improving bioethics by clarifying and elaborating its methodology: a response to Gomez-Virseda and colleagues.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Bioethics as bios ethikos.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

European bioethics institutions formed EURETHNET to address ethical pluralism and enhance European discourse in medicine and biotechnology. This network aims to improve information structures and foster international collaboration on bioethical issues.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Biotechnology Ethics
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • The European Commission's initiative for a European Research Area in biotechnology necessitates robust ethical discourse.
  • Cultural diversity within the EU highlights the need for improved bioethical information structures to manage ethical pluralism.
  • There is a growing demand for enhanced European input into international discussions on medical and biotechnology ethics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish an international network, EURETHNET, comprising leading European bioethics institutions.
  • To develop a comprehensive information network and knowledge base focused on ethics in medicine and biotechnology.
  • To foster European bioethics discourses and address ethical pluralism.

Main Methods:

  • Formation of an international network (EURETHNET) by 18 partners from nine European countries.
Keywords:
Bioethics and Professional EthicsBiomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • Agreement to collaboratively develop an information network and knowledge base.
  • Dissemination of the network's aims, scope, and realization.

    • Main Results:

    • Establishment of the EURETHNET network.
    • Initiation of a collaborative effort to build an information network and knowledge base.
    • Increased European participation in global bioethics discussions.

    Conclusions:

    • EURETHNET is a crucial step towards harmonizing bioethical discourse across Europe.
    • The network will facilitate a more informed and unified European contribution to international bioethics.
    • Improved information structures are essential for navigating ethical pluralism in biotechnology and medicine.