Heterodigital arterialized flaps for large finger wounds: results and indications

Deep defects of the hand and fingers with an unhealthy bed exposing denuded tendon, bone, joint, or neurovascular structures require flap coverage. However, the location and size of the defects often preclude the use of local flap coverage. Free-flap coverage is often not desirable either, because the recipient vessels may be unhealthy from surrounding infection or trauma. In such situations, a regional pedicled flap is preferable. A solution to this is the heterodigital arterialized flap. This flap is supplied by the digital artery and a dorsal vein of the finger for venous drainage. Unlike the neurovascular island flap, the digital nerve is left in situ in the donor finger, thus avoiding many of the neurologic complications associated with the Littler flap. The digital artery island flap is centered on the midlateral line of the donor finger. It extends from the middorsal line to the midpalmar line. The maximal length of the flap is from the base of the finger to the distal interphalangeal joint. By preserving the pulp and the digital nerve, a sensate pulp on the donor finger remains that reduces donor-finger morbidity and also preserves fingertip cosmesis. Twenty-nine flaps were performed in 29 patients and the outcomes in the donor finger and the reconstructed finger were reviewed. The flap survival was 100 percent. There were no cases of flap ischemia or flap congestion. Good venous drainage of the flap through the additional dorsal vein was helpful in preventing the occurrence of early postoperative venous congestion, which is common in island flaps of the fingers, which depend on only the venae comitantes for drainage. Donor-finger morbidity, measured in terms of range of motion and two-point discrimination in the pulp, was minimal. Ninety-seven percent of the donor fingers achieved excellent or good total active motion according to the criteria of Strickland and Glogovac. Pulp sensation in the donor fingers was normal in 28 of the 29 donor fingers. No cold intolerance of the donor finger or the adjacent finger is reported in this series.