Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two craniotomy arguments don't make it.

Robert P Goodwin1

  • 1Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43402, USA.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|April 26, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Neurobiological Determinism versus Human Freedom: Competing Explanatory Models and the Hope for Moral Enhancement.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

Craniotomy, a surgical procedure for fetal delivery, faces moral debate. This analysis examines arguments for its legitimacy, finding them inconclusive due to inherent flaws.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Obstetrics
  • Surgical Procedures

Background:

  • Craniotomy is a surgical intervention sometimes employed in fetal delivery.
  • This procedure elicits diverse moral viewpoints, both supportive and critical.
  • Understanding the ethical underpinnings of craniotomy in obstetrics is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate arguments supporting the moral legitimacy of fetal delivery via craniotomy.
  • To analyze the ethical justifications presented for this controversial obstetric procedure.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical examination of ethical arguments.
  • Logical analysis of moral reasoning concerning craniotomy.
  • Critical appraisal of existing justifications for the procedure.
Keywords:
Genetics and ReproductionPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Two primary arguments for the moral legitimacy of craniotomy were identified and analyzed.
  • Both arguments presented in favor of craniotomy were found to be logically flawed.
  • The examination concluded that the arguments presented are insufficient to establish moral legitimacy.

Conclusions:

  • The ethical justifications for craniotomy in fetal delivery, as presented, are inconclusive.
  • Further ethical discourse is required to address the moral complexities of this obstetric procedure.
  • The current arguments do not definitively resolve the moral debate surrounding craniotomy.