Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predicting pressure ulcer risk.

Nicola Waters1

  • 1Brighton General Hospital, Sussex.

Nursing Times
|April 29, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Braden scale effectively predicts pressure ulcer risk. This study evaluated its predictive validity and identified optimal timing for risk assessments in clinical settings.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient reported outcome measures require scale metrification and quantified precision: evidence from the assessment of breathlessness in people with ALS/MND.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration·2025
Same author

Lost in translation.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2024
Same author

Safety and efficacy of memantine and trazodone versus placebo for motor neuron disease (MND SMART): stage two interim analysis from the first cycle of a phase 3, multiarm, multistage, randomised, adaptive platform trial.

The Lancet. Neurology·2024
Same author

IWII Wound Infection in Clinical Practice consensus document: 2022 update.

Journal of wound care·2022
Same author

Novel Smart Sensor Platform for Monitoring Multiple Pressure Injury Risk Factors: A Feasibility Study in a Post-Acute Care Facility.

Surgical technology international·2022
Same author

Device-related pressure ulcers: SECURE prevention. Second edition.

Journal of wound care·2022
Same journal

'The little things count': delivering dignified care.

Nursing times·2018
Same journal

The heart of the hospital.

Nursing times·2018
Same journal

The nurse's role in caring for people with dementia.

Nursing times·2018
Same journal

Hepatitis C and the ongoing challenge of genotype 3.

Nursing times·2018
Same journal

Implementing change in older people's acute care.

Nursing times·2018
Same journal

A total health economy approach to revalidation.

Nursing times·2018
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Clinical assessment tools
  • Nursing research
  • Patient safety

Background:

  • The Braden scale is a standard tool for assessing pressure ulcer risk.
  • Concerns exist regarding the Braden scale's predictive validity.
  • Reliability and validity are crucial for effective clinical tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively evaluate the Braden scale's effectiveness in predicting pressure ulcer development.
  • To determine critical cut-off points for risk assessment and their reproducibility.
  • To establish optimal timing for conducting pressure ulcer risk assessments.

Main Methods:

  • A quantitative research paradigm was employed.
  • Data were collected across three diverse clinical settings in the USA.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study focused on evaluating the predictive validity of the Braden scale.

    • Main Results:

    • The Braden scale demonstrated effectiveness in predicting pressure ulcer risk.
    • Specific cut-off points were identified, with an assessment of their reproducibility.
    • Insights into optimal timing for risk assessments were gained.

    Conclusions:

    • The Braden scale is a valuable tool for identifying patients at risk of pressure ulcers.
    • Further research can refine the application and timing of Braden scale assessments.
    • Ensuring the reliability and validity of the Braden scale supports improved patient outcomes.