Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reducing Knowledge of Results About Relative Versus Absolute Timing: Differential Effects on Learning.

G. Wulf1, T. D. Lee, R. A. Schmidt

  • 1Max-Planck-lnstitut fü;r psychologische Forschung, Leopoldstrasse 24, 80802 Mü;nchen, Germany.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Reduced knowledge of results (KR) frequency improved generalized motor program (GMP) learning but hindered parameter learning. This suggests distinct processes for GMP and parameter acquisition in motor skill development.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relative Phase Alterations During Bimanual Skill Acquisition.

Journal of motor behavior·1995
Same author

Feedback-Induced Variability and the Learning of Generalized Motor Programs.

Journal of motor behavior·1994
Same author

Augmented Kinematic Feedback for Motor Learning.

Journal of motor behavior·1992
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Motor Learning
  • Motor Control
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Previous research suggests reduced knowledge of results (KR) frequency enhances generalized motor program (GMP) learning while impairing parameter learning.
  • Existing studies often provide KR for all movement aspects simultaneously, complicating the dissociation of learning effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential effects of reduced KR frequency on relative timing (GMP learning) versus absolute timing (parameter learning).
  • To further explore the dissociation between GMP and parameterization processes in motor skill acquisition.

Main Methods:

  • Participants practiced three movement patterns with identical relative timing but varying absolute movement times.
  • Knowledge of results (KR) was administered at 100% or 50% frequency for relative timing or absolute timing separately.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Retention and transfer tests assessed learning of relative timing structure and parameterization accuracy for novel movement durations.

    • Main Results:

    • Reduced KR frequency (50%) for relative timing significantly enhanced GMP learning compared to 100% KR.
    • KR frequency did not affect parameterization during retention tests.
    • Higher KR frequency (100%) for absolute timing improved parameterization accuracy in transfer to a novel duration task.

    Conclusions:

    • Reduced KR frequency selectively benefits GMP learning, supporting its role in learning the fundamental structure of movements.
    • The findings indicate that parameter learning may require more consistent KR, especially for adapting to new movement parameters.
    • The differential impact of KR frequency on relative and absolute timing supports the dissociation of GMP and parameterization mechanisms in motor control.