Intraoperative hemostasis during spinal reconstructive procedures
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Real-Time Assessment of Spinal Cord Microperfusion in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion
Published on: December 10, 2020
Kerry T Thibodeaux1, Morgan P Lorio, Jon E Block
1Vascular Access Associates, Opelousas, La, USA.
Abstract:
In a consecutive sample of patients undergoing similar spinal reconstructive procedures in the thoracolumbar region, hemostatic effectiveness of a collagen-based composite (CoStasis; Cohesion Technologies, Palo Alto, Calif) n = 10) was compared with standard hemostatic methods (manual compression) (n = 9). All patients treated with CoStasis at the operative site(s) demonstrated immediate hemostasis,whereas all cases treated with gauze and sponges showed protracted bleeding (P < .01). The average perioperative blood loss was approximately twice as great among control patients compared to CoStasis patients (1322 mL versus 685 mL; P = .02). Total transfusion requirements and operative duration also were less among CoStasis patients. These findings suggest CoStasis may provide effective hemostasis in spinal reconstructive procedures such as instrumented fusion where blood loss is excessive.
Related Concept Videos
Vascular Spasm
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...