Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selective attention in children with learning disabilities.

S M Deikel, M P Friedman

    Perceptual and Motor Skills
    |April 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Perceptual vs conceptual categorization.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Rapid isolation and presumptive diagnosis of uropathogens by using membrane filtration and differential media.

    Journal of clinical microbiology·1991
    Same author

    Hair element content of violent criminals.

    Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie·1982
    Same author

    Behavioural and biochemical effects of tryptophan, tyrosine and phenylalanine in mice.

    Psychopharmacology·1982
    Same author

    Sudden swimming deaths: cardiac function, experimental anoxia, and learned helplessness.

    Psychophysiology·1979
    Same author

    Similarities between delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) and reserpine-like drugs.

    Behavioral biology·1976

    Children with learning disabilities showed better memory for irrelevant information compared to normal children. This suggests differences in attention and memory processing related to learning disabilities.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Educational Psychology

    Background:

    • Children's memory for incidental information is crucial for learning.
    • Understanding memory differences in learning disabled children is important for educational interventions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate memory recall differences between learning disabled and normal children.
    • To explore how task relevance influences incidental memory in these groups.

    Main Methods:

    • 49 children (11-14 years) divided into learning disabled and normal groups.
    • Participants performed a primary card-sorting task.
    • Incidental memory for task-relevant and irrelevant materials was assessed post-task.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Normal children recalled more task-relevant incidental materials.
    • Learning disabled children recalled more task-irrelevant incidental materials.
    • This indicates distinct memory processing strategies based on learning ability.

    Conclusions:

    • Learning disabled children may prioritize or attend to different types of information.
    • Results support exploring motivational or developmental lag theories for these differences.
    • Findings have implications for tailoring educational strategies to individual learning profiles.