Psychopathology and social competencies of adolescents who were extremely low birth weight
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Saroj Saigal1, Janet Pinelli, Lorraine Hoult
1Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. saigal@mcmaster.ca
Insights
Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) adolescents show higher rates of depression and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to controls, but only when parents report these issues. Teen self-reports did not reveal significant differences.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Pediatric Psychiatry
- Neonatal Follow-up Studies
Background:
- Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants are known to be vulnerable to inattention and hyperactivity during school age.
- The persistence of these behavioral issues into adolescence for ELBW individuals remains largely unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare psychopathology levels in adolescents born extremely low birth weight (ELBW) versus sociodemographically matched term-born controls.
- To assess discrepancies between adolescent self-reports and parental reports of behavioral and emotional difficulties.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted in a geographically defined region.
- Participants included 141 extremely low birth weight (ELBW) adolescents and 122 term-born controls, aged 12-16 years, along with their parents.
- The Ontario Child Health Study-Revised questionnaire assessed conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), overanxious disorder, separation anxiety, and depression.
Main Results:
- Adolescent self-reports showed no significant differences in psychopathology scores between extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and control groups.
- Parents of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) adolescents reported significantly higher scores for depression and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to parents of controls.
- Parental reports explained a greater variance in behavioral scores (12.5%-22.0%) than adolescent self-reports (3.4%-8.2%).
Conclusions:
- Parental reports reveal elevated risks for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) adolescents.
- Discrepancies between adolescent and parent reports highlight the importance of multiple informants in assessing adolescent psychopathology.
- Family function, developmental quotient, maternal mood, and socioeconomic status were significant predictors of behavioral scores in parental reports.
Background:
We have previously shown that infants who were extremely low birth weight (ELBW) are particularly vulnerable to problems related to inattention and hyperactivity at school age. It is not known whether these problems persist to adolescence.
Objective:
To explore and compare the levels of psychopathology in a regional cohort of ELBW infants and sociodemographically matched term controls as reported by teens and their parents.
Design/Methods:
Cross-sectional cohort study/geographically defined region.
Participants:
TEENS: ELBW 141/169 (83%) and control 122/145 (84%), aged 12 to 16 years. PARENTS: ELBW 143/169 (85%) and control 123/145 (85%). Both cohorts and their parents completed the Ontario Child Health Study-Revised questionnaire with 6 behavioral subsca1es: conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), overanxious, separation anxiety, and depression.
Results:
By teen self-report, there were no significant differences between ELBW and control teens on any of the 6 subscale scores. However, parents of ELBW teens reported significantly higher scores than parents of control for depression and ADHD based on 2-way analysis of variance (group x gender). Comparison within teen/parent dyads showed that both cohorts of teens reported significantly higher scores than their parents. Multivariable analyses on behavioral subscale scores demonstrated a number of variables that were significant predictors by parent report: group (ELBW vs control), gender, family function, developmental quotient, maternal mood, and socioeconomic status; no predictors were significant by teen report. There were no statistically significant interaction effects for any of the models. These models explained a greater percent of the variance in behavioral scores for parents than for teens (12.5%-22.0% vs 3.4%-8.2%). Results were similar when teens with neurosensory impairment were excluded.
Conclusions:
This study is unique in the inclusion of both parent and teen self-report of behaviors. Significant differences were apparent only by parent report for ADHD and depression among ELBW teens. Significant predictors of behavioral scores for parents include group, gender, family function, developmental quotient, maternal mood, and socioeconomic status.
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Stella Chess...
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Behavioral Characteristics and...
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Adler's Individual Psychology
Bullying
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Childhood
The first four of Erikson's eight psychosocial stages...
