Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bioterrorism, embryonic stem cells, and Frankenstein.

Patrick Guinan1

  • 1Department of Urology, University of Illinois-Chicago College of Medicine, USA.

Journal of Religion and Health
|May 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary

The stem cell controversy questions the pursuit of scientific knowledge at any cost. Ethical considerations must temper the drive for pure knowledge, as human history suggests potential dangers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What Do Medical Students Think about Medical Ethics? UIC-COM Student Medical Ethics Questionnaire.

The Linacre quarterly·2018
Same author

Frailty and old age.

The Linacre quarterly·2016
Same author

ENSO and PDO-related climate variability impacts on Midwestern United States crop yields.

International journal of biometeorology·2016
Same author

Suppression of BCL2 by Antisense Oligonucleotides and Compensation by Non-Targeted Genes May Enhance Tumor Proliferation.

In vivo (Athens, Greece)·2015
Same author

Hippocrates and the affordable care act.

The Linacre quarterly·2014
Same author

Additional compensatory mechanisms altering antisense oligonucleotide suppression of BCL2: effects upon AKT1 and STAT3.

In vivo (Athens, Greece)·2014

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • The pursuit of scientific knowledge, particularly in areas like stem cell research, often operates under the principle of "knowledge for its own sake."
  • This principle, rooted in Enlightenment ideals, suggests that scientific inquiry should not be limited by potential costs.
  • However, historical and literary narratives offer cautionary tales regarding the unchecked pursuit of knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the ethical dimensions of the stem cell controversy.
  • To examine the tension between the imperative to gain knowledge and the potential ethical costs involved.
  • To advocate for the integration of ethical considerations into scientific advancement.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of the "knowledge for its own sake" principle.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and ReproductionWar and Human Rights Abuses

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of historical and literary examples illustrating the consequences of unchecked scientific pursuit.
  • Ethical argumentation regarding the limits of scientific inquiry.

    • Main Results:

    • The Enlightenment ideal of "knowledge for its own sake" is challenged by inherent ethical issues.
    • Human history and literature provide evidence of the negative repercussions of prioritizing knowledge acquisition above all else.
    • Ethical considerations are not merely secondary but integral to the responsible pursuit of science.

    Conclusions:

    • The stem cell controversy exemplifies a broader ethical dilemma in science.
    • A critical re-evaluation of the "knowledge for its own sake" imperative is necessary.
    • Ethical frameworks must guide scientific endeavors to mitigate potential harm and ensure responsible innovation.