Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus representation in SOP: I. Theoretical rationalization and some implications.

Susan E. Brandon1, Edgar H. Vogel, Allan R. Wagner

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University, American Psychological Association, 750 First Street NE, 20002-4242, Washington, DC, USA

Behavioural Processes
|May 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary

The SOP model evolved to AESOP and C-SOP, incorporating componential stimulus representations. A modified learning rule explains Pavlovian conditioning timing and compound stimulus data.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stimulus representation in SOP: II. An application to inhibition of delay.

Behavioural processesยท2003
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • * Cognitive psychology and animal behavior research.
  • * Focus on learning theories and memory mechanisms.

Background:

  • * The original SOP model explained Pavlovian conditioning through stimulus representation and learning rules.
  • * Challenges led to the development of AESOP (dual US representation) and C-SOP (multi-component CS representation).

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To detail the evolution of the SOP model with componential stimulus representations.
  • * To demonstrate how modified models account for specific conditioning phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • * Theoretical analysis of stimulus representation in animal learning models.
  • * Examination of learning rules within the SOP, AESOP, and C-SOP frameworks.
  • * Application of the C-SOP model to explain Pavlovian conditioning timing and Rescorla's compound stimulus data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • * Componential stimulus representation in C-SOP necessitates a modified, "constrained" learning rule.
  • * This modified rule successfully explains the timing of conditioned responses.
  • * The model accounts for Rescorla's findings on the differential fate of stimuli trained in compound.

Conclusions:

  • * Componential stimulus representations are crucial for accurately modeling complex learning.
  • * The modified learning rule in C-SOP provides a robust explanation for observed Pavlovian conditioning phenomena.
  • * This theoretical advancement refines our understanding of associative learning in animals.