Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why knees fail.

Kelly G Vince1

  • 1Center for Arthritis and Joint Replacement Surgery, University of Southern California, 1450 San Pablo Street, Suite 5100, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.

The Journal of Arthroplasty
|May 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding the cause of failure is crucial for successful revision knee arthroplasty. This study proposes nine differential diagnoses to guide surgeons in revision knee surgery, emphasizing correction of original shortcomings.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does Transitioning to Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Change Surgeon Revision Risk or Failure Modes?: A Baseline Comparative Analysis Before and After Robotic Adoption.

JB & JS open access·2026
Same author

The AAHKS Surgical Techniques and Technologies Award: What Is the Ideal Technique and Implant in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? An Analysis of Second Revision and Component Loosening Rates From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

What Are the Relative Associations of Surgeon Performance and Prosthesis Quality With THA Revision Rates?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2024
Same author

No Difference in Revision Rates or Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Between Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of 5,025 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties From the New Zealand Joint Registry.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2024
Same author

A Systematic Review of Data Collection by National Joint Replacement Registries: What Opportunities Exist for Enhanced Data Collection and Analysis?

JBJS reviews·2023
Same author

Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2023
Same journal

Acute Kidney Injury Following Antibiotic-Loaded Spacer Insertion in Two-Stage Knee Arthroplasty Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Tourniquet Use in Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: Small Gains in Fixation, No Clear Benefit in Aseptic Loosening. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Patient Satisfaction and Outcomes at a Mean 11-Year Follow-Up Following Total Hip Arthroplasty with Subtrochanteric Osteotomy for Dislocated Hips After Schanz Osteotomy.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Comparative Analysis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rates After Total Hip Arthroplasty Across Facility Types: A Single Institution Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Preoperative Pneumonia and Its Association With Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Postoperative Complications After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Prior Internal Fixation: A Comparison with Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Failure Analysis

Background:

  • Revision knee arthroplasty is complex, necessitating a thorough understanding of the reasons for primary implant failure.
  • Accurate diagnosis of the failure mechanism is paramount for successful surgical outcomes.
  • Existing literature often lacks a comprehensive framework for the differential diagnosis of failed knee arthroplasty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a systematic differential diagnosis for failed knee arthroplasty, encompassing nine distinct categories.
  • To guide orthopedic surgeons in identifying the specific cause of failure prior to revision surgery.
  • To emphasize that revision surgery should address the root cause of failure, not just mechanical issues.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of clinical case studies and biomechanical analyses of failed knee arthroplasties.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a classification system for common and uncommon causes of knee arthroplasty failure.
  • Clinical consensus on the proposed diagnostic categories.

    • Main Results:

    • Nine primary causes of revision knee arthroplasty failure were identified: aseptic loosening, instability, patellar complications, unknown causes ('mystery knee'), implant failure, sepsis, extensor mechanism rupture, stiffness, and fracture.
    • A structured approach to differential diagnosis can significantly improve the accuracy of identifying failure etiology.
    • Each proposed category represents a distinct pathological or mechanical failure mode.

    Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive differential diagnosis is essential for successful revision knee arthroplasty.
    • Addressing the specific cause of failure, rather than just mechanical restoration, leads to better long-term outcomes.
    • The proposed nine-point classification provides a valuable framework for clinicians managing failed knee replacements.