Related Experiment Videos
Constraint in total knee arthroplasty: when and what?
James P McAuley1, Gerard A Engh
1Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, PO Box 7088, Alexandria, VA 22307, USA.
The Journal of Arthroplasty
|May 6, 2003
Summary
Tibiofemoral instability is a frequent cause of total knee arthroplasty failure. Linked implants offer the most reliable solution for unstable total knee arthroplasty with severe laxity.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Knee Arthroplasty
Background:
- Tibiofemoral instability is a recognized complication in total knee arthroplasty.
- Limited guidelines exist for managing unstable total knee arthroplasty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review treatment options for tibiofemoral instability after total knee arthroplasty.
- To discuss component selection and expected outcomes for unstable total knee arthroplasty.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of treatment strategies for unstable total knee arthroplasty.
- Analysis of implant designs (cruciate-retaining, cruciate-substituting, constrained, linked) for managing instability.
Main Results:
- Cruciate-retaining designs require balanced ligaments.
- Cruciate-substituting components lack varus-valgus stability and do not address flexion laxity.
- Constrained designs may not offer long-term stability for severe instability.
- Linked implants provide reliable treatment for severe tibiofemoral instability and flexion laxity.
Conclusions:
- Management of tibiofemoral instability in total knee arthroplasty depends on the degree of ligamentous balance and laxity.
- Linked implants are the most reliable option for severe cases of instability and flexion laxity.