Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cementless acetabular components: the gold standard for socket revision.

Aaron G Rosenberg1

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush Medical College, 1725 West Harrison Avenue, Suite 1063, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

The Journal of Arthroplasty
|May 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early outcomes of a modern cemented total knee arthroplasty : is tibial loosening a concern?

The bone & joint journal·2021
Same author

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age: Results at a Mean of 13 Years.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2019
Same author

Elevated Serum Metal Levels from Vitamin Supplementation: A Case Report.

JBJS case connector·2017
Same author

TKA patients with unsatisfying knee function show changes in neuromotor synergy pattern but not joint biomechanics.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2017
Same author

Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Randomized Trial of 400 vs 700 cGy.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2016
Same author

Surgical Anatomy of the Knee A Review of Common Open Approaches.

Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)·2016

Hemispherical ingrowth sockets are a common choice for acetabular revision surgery. Surgeons must master implantation techniques and recognize when alternative methods are necessary for optimal patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Hemispherical ingrowth sockets are widely adopted for acetabular revision procedures, representing over 90% of cases.
  • Existing literature demonstrates the efficacy of this technique across various clinical scenarios and patient cohorts.
  • Successful implantation requires a thorough understanding of surgical technique and patient-specific factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the established success of hemispherical ingrowth sockets in acetabular revision.
  • To highlight the critical surgical considerations for successful implantation.
  • To identify limitations and contraindications for this technique, guiding alternative treatment strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing clinical data and surgical outcomes related to hemispherical ingrowth sockets.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of factors influencing the success and failure rates of the technique.
  • Synthesis of evidence to delineate appropriate and inappropriate clinical settings for use.

    • Main Results:

    • Hemispherical ingrowth sockets demonstrate high success rates in acetabular revision surgeries.
    • Successful outcomes are contingent upon precise surgical technique and appropriate patient selection.
    • Certain clinical settings and patient factors may compromise the efficacy of this implant.

    Conclusions:

    • Hemispherical ingrowth sockets are a reliable option for acetabular revision when implanted correctly.
    • Surgeons must possess comprehensive knowledge of the technique and its limitations.
    • Preoperative planning should include consideration of alternative revision strategies for challenging cases.