Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
Longitudinal Intravital Imaging of Brain Tumor Cell Behavior in Response to an Invasive Surgical Biopsy
Published on: May 3, 2019
Stereotactically-guided biopsies of brainstem tumors
F Chico-Ponce de León1, M Perezpeña-Diazconti, E Castro-Sierra
1Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Dr. Márquez 162, col Doctores, Delegación Cuauhtémoc, 06720, México DF, Mexico. fernandochico@prodigy.net.mx
Introduction:
More than 10 years ago, the goal of our work had been to obtain a tissue sample of infiltrating lesions of the brainstem that had been diagnosed using computerized axial tomography (CAT). At that time, biopsies were believed to be indispensable when starting treatment of tumors. With time our objectives changed. Biopsies remained necessary, since until 1 year before the writing of this article we had not had the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at our Hospital. We also decided that carrying out sound statistics, confirmed by biopsies, was in itself a good procedure, especially in a country in which, to date, no serial studies of brainstem tumors had been undertaken.
Methods:
We analyzed all of the patients diagnosed with posterior fossa tumors between March 1989 and March 2002 at the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez (HIM). A preoperative TAC of the cranium was performed on every patient. Stereotactically-guided biopsies during tomography allowed precise control of penetration. Material obtained was sent to the Department of Pathology for analysis.
Results:
Fifty patients were diagnosed with infiltrating tumors of the brainstem: 30 cases of low-grade astrocytomas, 13 cases of high-grade astrocytomas, 2 cases of primitive neuroectodermic tumors, 2 cases of rhabdoid tumors, 1 case of ependymoma, and 2 patients had non-specified tumors. The most frequent symptoms and signs were ataxia and disturbances of the cranial nerves. There was no mortality caused by penetration, and follow-up studies of more than 5 years were carried out.
Discussion:
The results from our series were similar to those in the literature. In our case, follow-up studies were undertaken for longer periods. In the first section of our work, we suggest the need for stereotactic biopsies in order to arrive at a precise diagnosis in environments in which MRI may be unavailable.
Conclusion:
At present, presumptive diagnosis of infiltrating brainstem lesions may be adequately undertaken with imaging methods, such as MRI. However, we believe that a stereotactically-guided biopsy provides an accurate method for diagnosing lesions of the brainstem. In our case, this procedure has been carried out entirely in the tomography room, without any complications of disease or mortality.
