Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in spatial learning.

J B Trobalon1, D Miguelez, I P L McLaren

  • 1Department de Psicologia Basica, Facultat de Psicologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 171-08035, Barcelona, Spain. jbtrobalon@psi.ub.es

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|May 9, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modulating perceptual learning: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces the face inversion effect (FIE), while cathodal tDCS restores it to baseline.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2025
Same author

Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to selectively modulate the face inversion effect and N170 event-related potentials.

Perception·2023
Same author

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) eliminates the other-race effect (ORE) indexed by the face inversion effect for own versus other-race faces.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to influence decision criterion in a target detection paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2022
Same author

Using transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to investigate why faces are and are not special.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Special issue on recent advances in perceptual learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2021
Same journal

The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Pigeons use low rather than high spatial frequency information to make visual category discriminations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Associative models of instrumental learning: a response to Dupuis and Dawson.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
See all related articles

Animals learn new spatial tasks faster if they are similar to previous ones. However, this depends on how the rewarded and unrewarded options are spatially arranged, suggesting focused attention on relevant landmarks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Animal behavior
  • Spatial learning

Background:

  • Extradimensional (ED) shifts are learned slower than intradimensional (ID) shifts in animal discrimination tasks.
  • Spatial learning involves understanding the relationships between stimuli and rewards in an environment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of ID and ED shifts on spatial learning in rats.
  • To determine if prior spatial training influences the speed of learning a second spatial discrimination.
  • To examine how the spatial configuration of stimuli affects extradimensional and intradimensional shifts.

Main Methods:

  • Rats were trained on initial discrimination tasks.
  • Subsequent spatial learning tasks were introduced, varying the dimensional relationship (ID vs. ED) and spatial arrangement of stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Learning speed and accuracy were measured to compare performance across conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Rats showed faster learning on a second spatial problem if the first problem was also spatial (ID shift), compared to a non-spatial first problem (ED shift).
    • The benefit of prior spatial training was modulated by the spatial relationship between the rewarded (S+) and unrewarded (S-) stimuli in both problems.
    • Performance indicated that rats did not attend to all spatial landmarks but selectively focused on those differentiating S+ and S-.

    Conclusions:

    • Prior spatial experience facilitates subsequent spatial learning, particularly when the tasks share relevant dimensions.
    • The spatial arrangement of rewarded and unrewarded stimuli critically influences the efficiency of spatial extradimensional and intradimensional shifts.
    • Rats exhibit selective attention in spatial learning, focusing on landmarks that are crucial for discriminating between rewarded and unrewarded options.