Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gonial angle changes after bilateral unidirectional mandibular distraction in sheep.

M Helmy1, J Lammens, A Struelens

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, University Hospitals of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.

European Journal of Orthodontics
|May 10, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real world efficacy of dupilumab in switchers versus biological naive CRSwNP patients.

Rhinology·2026
Same author

Assessment of orthodontic treatment need, treatment complexity, treatment priority, and oral health-related quality of life of healthy children and adolescents: A scoping review.

Community dental health·2026
Same author

Soft tissue defect closure using an Ilizarov frame: a case series.

Acta orthopaedica Belgica·2024
Same author

Papineau-irrigation technique: an alternative treatment of fracture-related infectious soft tissue defects.

Acta orthopaedica Belgica·2024
Same author

First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Systematic screening for a proximal DVT in COVID-19 hospitalized patients: Results of a comparative study.

Journal de medecine vasculaire·2021

This study examined how different surgical techniques for lengthening the lower jaw in sheep affect the shape of the jawbone. Researchers tested three methods of cutting and stretching the bone but found that the final bone shape varied greatly regardless of the specific surgical plan used.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics research within gonial angle morphology
  • Veterinary surgery and skeletal reconstruction studies

Background:

Skeletal discrepancies often require surgical intervention to restore functional alignment of the lower jaw. Clinicians frequently utilize distraction osteogenesis to lengthen bone segments in a controlled manner. That uncertainty drove the need to understand how specific surgical cuts influence final bone geometry. Prior research has shown that the angle of the lower jaw is sensitive to mechanical forces during growth. No prior work had resolved how varying the orientation of bone cuts affects this specific anatomical landmark in animal models. This gap motivated an investigation into whether standardized protocols could reliably predict morphological outcomes. Previous studies often lacked the rigorous control required to isolate the effects of distraction vectors. Understanding these variables remains a challenge for surgeons aiming to achieve predictable aesthetic and functional results.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different distraction protocols on the gonial angle area. Researchers sought to determine if specific surgical cut patterns could reliably influence the final shape of the jawbone. This investigation addressed the uncertainty surrounding the predictability of bone lengthening procedures in a controlled animal model. The team hypothesized that varying the orientation of the distraction force would lead to distinct morphological changes. By testing three separate protocols, they intended to identify a method that provides consistent anatomical results. The motivation for this work stemmed from the need to improve surgical precision in reconstructive jaw procedures. No prior work had successfully demonstrated a clear link between these specific surgical variables and the final bone geometry. The researchers aimed to provide clarity on whether standardized surgical planning can overcome the inherent challenges of bone remodeling.

Keywords:
bone lengtheningorthognathic surgeryskeletal remodelingdistraction osteogenesis

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers observed substantial inconsistency in both the size of the bone gaps and the resulting jaw angles. This variability occurred across all three tested surgical protocols, preventing the identification of a distinct radiographic signature for any specific method.

The study utilized specialized mechanical devices known as distractors to apply force. These tools were positioned either perpendicular or at an angle to the surgical bone cuts to test different vectors of bone lengthening.

Standardized conditions were necessary to isolate the effects of the surgical cuts from other variables. However, the authors noted that achieving identical bone cut lines across different animal subjects proved technically challenging during the procedure.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The review approach involved a controlled experiment using ten sheep to evaluate bone lengthening techniques. Investigators performed bilateral procedures on nine subjects while maintaining one animal as a sham-operated control group. Three distinct surgical strategies were applied to the jawbone to test different mechanical vectors. Each protocol involved a specific orientation of the bone cut and the subsequent placement of the stretching devices. The team applied a consistent lengthening rate of one millimeter per day over a twenty-day period. Following a three-week retention phase, the specimens underwent dissection and hemisection for detailed analysis. The researchers utilized contact radiographs to visualize the bone gaps and quantify the resulting morphological changes. Finally, they compared these experimental measurements against data from four non-distracted control mandibles to establish a baseline.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature reveal that the distraction procedures resulted in highly inconsistent bone gap sizes across all subjects. The researchers could not distinguish between the three surgical protocols based on the final radiographic appearance of the jaw. Measurements of the gonial angle showed significant variability, indicating that the intended mechanical vectors did not produce uniform anatomical changes. Even when surgeons attempted to follow standardized guidelines, the actual bone cuts varied between individual animals. The study confirms that achieving precise, reproducible bone geometry remains difficult in this experimental model. No specific protocol demonstrated a superior ability to control the final shape of the mandible. The data highlight a lack of correlation between the planned surgical approach and the observed morphological outcome. These results suggest that biological factors or minor procedural deviations may significantly influence the healing process.

Conclusions:

The authors report that significant variability exists in bone gap formation following mandibular distraction procedures. Synthesis and implications suggest that the specific surgical protocols tested do not reliably dictate the final jaw shape. Researchers observed that the intended bone cut patterns were difficult to replicate even under strictly controlled conditions. These findings imply that current surgical techniques for jaw lengthening may lead to unpredictable anatomical changes. The study highlights the limitations of relying on standardized distraction vectors to achieve precise morphological control. Clinicians should interpret these results as evidence that individual biological responses may outweigh procedural planning. Future efforts must account for the inherent difficulty in achieving consistent surgical execution in these models. The data indicate that the gonial angle remains highly variable regardless of the chosen distraction strategy.

Radiographic imaging provided the primary data for analysis. Researchers performed hemisectioning of the mandibles to capture standardized contact images, which allowed for the precise tracing of distracted gaps and measurement of the jaw angles.

The researchers measured the gonial angle, which represents the curvature at the back of the lower jaw. They compared these measurements against non-distracted control mandibles to quantify the impact of the distraction process.

The authors propose that the difficulty in reproducing intended bone cuts limits the predictability of these procedures. They suggest that surgeons should anticipate high variability in anatomical outcomes when performing this type of mandibular reconstruction.