Related Experiment Videos
A pretty pass: when is there a right to die?
1Court of Appeal, Royal Courts of Justice, London.
Clinical Medicine (London, England)
|May 10, 2003
Summary
Individuals face legal limits on the right to choose the timing and manner of their death. Contrasting cases highlight the evolving interpretation of human rights concerning end-of-life decisions.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Human Rights Law
Background:
- The right to die involves complex ethical and legal considerations.
- Previous legal decisions have established precedents regarding end-of-life choices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the current scope and boundaries of an individual's right to choose the timing and manner of death.
- To analyze the implications of the European Convention of Human Rights on end-of-life autonomy.
Main Methods:
- Comparative legal analysis of landmark cases (Mrs. Pretty and Ms. B).
- Examination of the European Convention of Human Rights and its potential evolution.
Main Results:
- Contrasting outcomes in Mrs. Pretty (denied choice) and Ms. B (granted choice) cases.
- The European Convention of Human Rights currently does not explicitly guarantee a right to die.
Conclusions:
- The right to self-determination in end-of-life decisions remains contested within current legal frameworks.
- Future interpretations of the European Convention of Human Rights may expand the right to die.