Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The interference of electronic implants in low frequency electromagnetic fields.

J Silny1

  • 1Research Center for Bioelectromagnetic Interaction (femu), University Hospital of Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 20, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Archives Des Maladies Du Coeur Et Des Vaisseaux
|May 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Electronic implants like cardiac pacemakers can be affected by electromagnetic fields. This study investigated interference thresholds for pacemakers in electric and magnetic fields, finding potential risks in everyday situations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fibrillation threshold induced by alternating current and alternating voltage.

Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering·2011
Same author

[Electromagnetic fields, electric current and bone healing - what is the evidence?].

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie·2011
Same author

The influence of anatomical and physiological parameters on the interference voltage at the input of unipolar cardiac pacemakers in low frequency electric fields.

Physics in medicine and biology·2009
Same author

Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.

Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B·2006
Same author

[Chiparray-based identification of gene expression in HUVECs treated with low frequency electric fields].

Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V...·2006
Same author

Duodenal motility is not affected during duodenotomy in pigs.

Acta veterinaria Hungarica·2006

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Electromagnetism
  • Medical Device Safety

Background:

  • Electronic implants, such as cardiac pacemakers, are susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI).
  • EMI can lead to temporary malfunctions, ranging from minor discomfort to life-threatening situations for implant recipients.
  • Understanding EMI effects is crucial for patient safety and device development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interference mechanisms and thresholds of cardiac pacemakers when exposed to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields.
  • To determine worst-case scenarios for pacemaker patients in various electromagnetic environments.
  • To assess the practical implications of EMI in everyday situations.

Main Methods:

  • Laboratory studies involving over 100 cardiac pacemakers (both older and current models).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of interference mechanisms under varying electric and magnetic field strengths, frequencies, and modulations.
  • Evaluation of factors influencing interference thresholds, including pacemaker type, implantation site, and patient physiology.

    • Main Results:

    • Preliminary results indicate that electric fields of approximately 5 kV/m can cause interference in unipolar pacemakers.
    • Magnetic field interference thresholds range from 16 to 552 microTesla (µT) for atrially-controlled pacemakers between 10-250 Hz.
    • Worst-case interference voltages were observed under specific conditions, such as vertically-oriented electric fields.

    Conclusions:

    • Cardiac pacemakers can be susceptible to electromagnetic interference in common everyday environments.
    • While worst-case scenarios pose risks, the actual probability of interference in practical situations appears low.
    • Further verification in real-world settings is ongoing to fully assess practical risks.