Related Experiment Videos
[Varicocele and coincidental abacterial prostato-vesiculitis: negative role about the sperm output]
Enzo Vicari1, Sandro La Vignera, Angelo Tracia
1Catt. Andrologia, Ist. Medicina Interna & Spec. Internistiche, Università di Catania, Osp. Garibaldi: P.zza S.M. Gesù, 95123 Catania, Italy. acaloger@unict.it
Objective:
To evaluate the frequency and the role of a coincidentally expressed abacterial prostato-vesiculitis (PV) on sperm output in patients with left varicocele (Vr).
Materials And Methods:
We evaluated 143 selected infertile patients (mean age 27 years, range 21-43), with oligo- and/or astheno- and/or teratozoospermia (OAT) subdivided in two groups. Group A included 76 patients with previous varicocelectomy and persistent OAT. Group B included 67 infertile patients (mean age 26 years, range 21-37) with OAT and not varicocelectomized. Patients with Vr and coincidental didymo-epididymal ultrasound (US) abnormalities were excluded from the study. Following rectal prostato-vesicular ultrasonography, each group was subdivided in two subsets on the basis of the absence (group A: subset Vr-/PV-; and group B: subset Vr+/PV-) or the presence of an abacterial PV (group A: subset Vr-/PV+; group B: subset Vr+/PV+). Particularly, PV was present in 47.4% and 41.8% patients of groups A and B, respectively. This coincidental pathology was ipsilateral with Vr in the 61% of the cases. Semen analysis was performed in all patients.
Results:
Patients of group A showed a total sperm number significantly higher than those found in group B. In presence of PV, sperm parameters were not significantly different between matched--subsets (Vr-/PV+ vs. Vr+/PV+). In absence of PV, the sperm density, the total sperm number and the percentage of forward motility from subset with previous varicocelectomy (Vr-/PV) exhibited values significantly higher than those found in the matched--subset (Vr+/PV-).
Conclusion:
Sperm analysis alone performed in patients with left Vr is not a useful prognostic post-varicocelectomy marker. Since following varicocelectomy a lack of sperm response could mask another coincidental pathology, the identification through US scans of a possible PV may be mandatory. On the other hand, an integrated uro-andrological approach, including US scans, allows to enucleate subsets of patients with Vr alone, who will have an expected better sperm response following Vr repair.