Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A new model-based RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering.

B L Kaptein1, E R Valstar, B C Stoel

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600 RC, Leiden 2300, The Netherlands. b.l.kaptein@lumc.nl

Journal of Biomechanics
|May 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Model-based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) of polyethylene implants.

Medical engineering & physics·2024
Same author

Less wear in deep-dished mobile compared to fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty of the same design at 5-year follow-up: a randomised controlled model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis trial.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2023
Same author

Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement using radiostereometric analysis.

The Knee·2021
Same author

Fixation and clinical outcome of uncemented peri-apatite-coated <i>versus</i> cemented total knee arthroplasty : five-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

The bone & joint journal·2017
Same author

Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography.

The international journal of cardiovascular imaging·2017
Same author

Validation of static and dynamic radiostereometric analysis of the knee joint using bone models from CT data.

Bone & joint research·2017
Same journal

Multiscale modeling of vascular adaptation: methodological advances and open challenges.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Improving physiological fidelity of in vitro knee simulators through bidirectional optimized muscle control.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Understanding the mechanisms behind the annuloplasty effect in tricuspid valve TEER: a computational study.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

An efficient framework for fully deformable finite element musculoskeletal spine modeling: development, sensitivity analysis, and validation.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Modulation of lower limb joint stiffness during a Half-Marathon in male runners with Varying Degrees of arch support.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Sex differences in hamstring muscle and aponeurosis thickness.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
See all related articles

Model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) offers an alternative to traditional marker-based methods for measuring orthopaedic implant micromotion. Reversed engineering models provide superior accuracy compared to CAD models in phantom experiments.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) is crucial for measuring orthopaedic implant micromotion.
  • Conventional RSA relies on tantalum beads, posing a disadvantage.
  • Model-based RSA presents a potential solution by utilizing 3D implant models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and validate a model-based RSA algorithm.
  • To investigate the impact of implant model accuracy (CAD vs. RE) on RSA results.
  • To assess the precision of model-based RSA in phantom experiments.

Main Methods:

  • Development and validation of a model-based RSA algorithm.
  • Comparison of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models versus Reversed Engineering (RE) models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Phantom experiments to quantify positional and rotational accuracy.

    • Main Results:

    • Reversed Engineering (RE) models yielded more accurate results than CAD models.
    • High precision achieved with RE models: max standard deviation of 0.06 mm for translations (x, y) and 0.14 mm (z).
    • Rotational accuracy demonstrated with standard deviations of ~0.1 degrees (y-axis) and 0.05 degrees (x, z-axis).

    Conclusions:

    • Model-based RSA using RE models shows high accuracy in phantom studies.
    • This technique offers a promising, markerless alternative to conventional RSA.
    • Clinical validation is necessary to confirm applicability in real-world orthopaedic settings.