Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Are there differential word length effects in the two visual fields?

Sheng-Ping Fang¹

¹Department of Chinese Literature, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Sec 2 Kuang Fu Road, 30055 Hsinchu, Taiwan. spfang@mx.nthu.edu.tw

Brain and Language

|May 15, 2003

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026

Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026

Same journal

Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs.

Brain and language·2026

Same journal

The interplay between attentional control and language task schemas: Progressive adaptation of attentional control in interpreting.

Brain and language·2026

Same journal

You again? 14-month-olds show neural signatures of lexical-semantic activation for novel instead of familiar voices.

Brain and language·2026

Same journal

Five-year-old children engage temporal but not frontal mechanisms during morphosyntactic processing of sentences.

Brain and language·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

This study on word recognition found that word length effects are not strongly dependent on visual field or hemisphere. Word recognition appears more influenced by word frequency than brain hemisphere.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Linguistics

Background:

Investigating visual field effects on word recognition provides insights into brain lateralization.
Previous research suggests potential hemisphere-specific processing for visual stimuli, including words.

Purpose of the Study:

To determine if differential word length effects in the visual fields indicate hemisphere-dependent word recognition.
To explore the influence of word length, visual field, and task type on Chinese word processing.

Main Methods:

Six experiments were conducted using Chinese foreign names, three-character words, and phrases.
Word length was manipulated by varying characters, morphemes, or constituent words.
Tasks included linguistic judgments and target detection to assess word recognition involvement.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

No significant interaction between word length and visual field was found in most experiments.
A minor interaction occurred in character detection within foreign names, suggesting minimal lexical access.
Word recognition appears more dependent on word frequency than on hemisphere specialization.

Conclusions:

Hemisphere-dependent word recognition modes are not strongly supported by visual field length effects.
Word frequency is a more significant factor in word recognition than hemispheric dominance.
Chinese compound words and phrases exhibit distinct processing patterns despite visual similarities.