Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians: a randomized trial
Wim H J M Verstappen1, Trudy van der Weijden, Jildou Sijbrandij
1Center for Quality of Care Research, Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. wim.verstappen@hag.unimass.nl
Context:
Numbers of diagnostic tests ordered by primary care physicians are growing and many of these tests seem to be unnecessary according to established, evidence-based guidelines. An innovative strategy that focused on clinical problems and associated tests was developed.
Objective:
To determine the effects of a multifaceted strategy aimed at improving the performance of primary care physicians' test ordering.
Design:
Multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a balanced, incomplete block design and randomization at group level. Thirteen groups of primary care physicians underwent the strategy for 3 clinical problems (arm A; cardiovascular topics, upper and lower abdominal complaints), while 13 other groups underwent the strategy for 3 other clinical problems (arm B; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, general complaints, degenerative joint complaints). Each arm acted as a control for the other.
Setting:
Primary care physician groups in 5 regions in the Netherlands with diagnostic centers recruited from May to September 1998.
Study Participants:
Twenty-six primary care physician groups, including 174 primary care physicians.
Intervention:
During the 6 months of intervention, physicians discussed 3 consecutive, personal feedback reports in 3 small group meetings, related them to 3 evidence-based clinical guidelines, and made plans for change.
Main Outcome Measure:
According to existing national, evidence-based guidelines, a decrease in the total numbers of tests ordered per clinical problem, and of some defined inappropriate tests, is considered a quality improvement.
Results:
For clinical problems allocated to arm A, the mean total number of requested tests per 6 months per physician was reduced from baseline to follow-up by 12% among physicians in the arm A intervention, but was unchanged in the arm B control, with a mean reduction of 67 more tests per physician per 6 months in arm A than in arm B (P =.01). For clinical problems allocated to arm B, the mean total number of requested tests per 6 months per physician was reduced from baseline to follow-up by 8% among physicians in the arm B intervention, and by 3% in the arm A control, with a mean reduction of 28 more tests per physician per 6 months in arm B than in arm A (P =.22). Physicians in arm A had a significant reduction in mean total number of inappropriate tests ordered for problems allocated to arm A, whereas the reduction in inappropriate test ordered physicians in arm B for problems allocated to arm B was not statistically significant.
Conclusion:
In this study, a practice-based, multifaceted strategy using guidelines, feedback, and social interaction resulted in modest improvements in test ordering by primary care physicians.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
Blind Procedures
Obedience
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

