Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Decision tree SAR models for developmental toxicity based on an FDA/TERIS database.

N B Sussman1, V C Arena, S Yu

  • 1Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, A734 Crabtree Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. nbsl@pitt.edu

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research
|May 16, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pre-hospital prediction of adverse outcomes in patients with suspected COVID-19: Development, application and comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods.

Computers in biology and medicine·2022
Same author

Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cows in Small Farms in Bangladesh.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2020
Same author

Epidemiology and associated risk factors of giardiasis in a peri-urban setting in New South Wales Australia.

Epidemiology and infection·2018
Same author

Ultrafast dynamics of hemin aggregates.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2017
Same author

Transient Magnetophotoinduced Absorption Studies of Photoexcitations in π-Conjugated Donor-Acceptor Copolymers.

Physical review letters·2017
Same author

Prescription opioid analgesics for pain management in Australia: 20 years of dispensing.

Internal medicine journal·2015
Same journal

Mapping toxicity pathways of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using interpretable classification-based machine learning models.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Structure-based identification of inhibitory compounds targeting M32 metallocarboxypeptidase of <i>Leishmania donovani</i>.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Multiscale computational evaluation of marine fungal metabolites containing iminohydantoin-like scaffolds as anti-Alzheimer drug candidates.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Conformational landscapes and binding free energies of multitarget phytochemicals reveal molecular recognition mechanisms in colorectal cancer-associated proteins.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

AI-driven QSAR modelling and virtual screening in the discovery of selective dopamine D<sub>2</sub> receptor ligands.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Integrating machine learning and pharmacogenomics for biomarker discovery, identification and prioritization of potential drug candidates in ovarian cancer.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
See all related articles

Developing structure-activity relationship (SAR) models for developmental toxicity is crucial for assessing risks of untested chemicals. New models show modest accuracy, with ensemble methods like bagging improving predictions for chemical risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Thousands of environmental chemicals lack developmental toxicity data.
  • Structure-activity relationships (SARs) offer a potential solution for predicting toxicity.
  • Current SAR models for developmental toxicity are insufficient for risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate SAR models for predicting developmental toxicity.
  • To assess the effectiveness of decision tree modeling and ensemble approaches (bagging).

Main Methods:

  • Compiled a novel developmental toxicity database from TERIS and FDA guidelines.
  • Utilized Classification and Regression Tree (CART) software for decision tree modeling.
  • Applied a bagging ensemble approach to enhance model accuracy and reduce variability.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Decision tree developmental SAR models demonstrated modest prediction accuracy.
  • The bagging ensemble approach generally improved prediction accuracy.
  • Ensemble methods reduced the variability of prediction measures compared to single models.

Conclusions:

  • Developed SAR models show potential for developmental toxicity risk assessment.
  • Bagging and ensemble approaches enhance the reliability of developmental toxicity predictions.
  • Further refinement of the database and models can aid in assessing thousands of untested chemicals.