Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Inactivating a total artificial heart: special moral problems.

Robert M Veatch1

  • 1Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. veatchr@georgetown.edu

Death Studies
|May 17, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconciling Lists of Principles in Bioethics.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2020
Same author

Should Institutions Disclose the Names of Employees with Covid-19?

The Hastings Center report·2020
Same author

Organ donor intervention research informed consent - Timing and risk.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2019
Same author

Access to transplantation for persons with intellectual disability: Strategies for nondiscrimination.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2019
Same author

Controversies in defining death: a case for choice.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2019
Same author

Transplant candidates' perceptions of informed consent for accepting deceased donor organs subjected to intervention research and for participating in posttransplant research.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2019

Patients can withdraw consent for total artificial heart (TAH) use. However, removing the TAH raises ethical dilemmas regarding direct vs. indirect killing and the definition of death.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Cardiovascular Surgery

Background:

  • Patients' rights to withdraw consent for life-prolonging technologies, including the total artificial heart (TAH), are ethically debated.
  • The distinction between "indirect" killing (withholding treatment) and direct killing (active removal of TAH) presents a moral and legal challenge.

Discussion:

  • Societal definitions of death, particularly the cardiac standard, conflict with the active cessation of a TAH, potentially equating it to murder.
  • Revisiting the definition of death or legalizing direct cessation of TAH is necessary to resolve this inconsistency.

Key Insights:

  • Patient or surrogate consent is paramount for TAH deactivation or removal.
  • Physicians' objections do not override patient/surrogate wishes if the TAH provides desired life prolongation.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachDeath and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

Outlook:

  • Further ethical and legal discourse is needed to align TAH management with existing end-of-life care principles.
  • Clarifying the legal and ethical status of TAH deactivation is crucial for patient autonomy.