Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2026

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension and Assessment of Right Ventricular Function in the Piglet
Published on: November 4, 2015
Suspected pulmonary artery disruption after transvenous pulmonary embolectomy using a hydrodynamic thrombectomy
Jürgen Biederer1, Arne Schoene, Michael Reuter
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Kiel, Germany. juergen.biederer@rad.uni-kiel.de
Purpose:
To use porcine lung explants for reconstructing possible situations in which a vessel wall disruption might have occurred in a patient suffering fatal hemoptysis after pulmonary embolectomy with a hydrodynamic thrombectomy device.
Methods:
A 76-year-old woman with massive pulmonary embolism underwent transvenous pulmonary embolectomy using a 6-F AngioJet Xpeedior catheter according to manufacturer's instructions. While activating the device in the middle lobe artery (approximately 8 mm diameter), massive and ultimately fatal arterial bleeding occurred through the tracheal tube. Because no autopsy was authorized, an experimental study was designed to examine possible causes for the vessel disruption. Five fresh porcine heart-lung preparations were examined inside a dedicated chest phantom. Access to the pulmonary vessels was provided through catheters inside the right and left ventricular outlets. A low-flow circulation was maintained with an external pump. The 6-F AngioJet thrombectomy device was activated at 42 sites inside vessels from 2 to 10 mm in diameter; in one lung, 8 activations were made after deliberately withdrawing the guidewire.
Results:
Vessels >6 mm in diameter remained intact. Vessel wall disruption occurred in 4 of 7 vessels between 4 and 6 mm in diameter and in 13 of 14 segmental arteries <4 mm in diameter (regardless of whether or not a guidewire was used). The signs of vessel wall disruption included extravasation of contrast material, arteriovenous fistula, and laceration of distal airspaces with contrast inside the bronchus.
Conclusions:
The application of this system has to be considered potentially dangerous when activated inside vessels with diameters <6 mm. The use of this device appears to be safe only inside main branches of the lung vessels at this time. Additional experiments will be required to substantiate these initial results.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

