Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implications of removing a normal appendix.

C L Bijnen1, W T van den Broek, A B Bijnen

  • 1Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands. wtbroek@xs4all.nl

Digestive Surgery
|May 22, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections.

Surgical endoscopy·2022
Same author

Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections.

Surgical endoscopy·2022
Same author

Reasons for not reaching or using web-based self-management applications, and the use and evaluation of Oncokompas among cancer survivors, in the context of a randomised controlled trial.

Internet interventions·2021
Same author

The eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas' that supports cancer survivors to improve health-related quality of life and reduce symptoms: which groups benefit most?

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2020
Same author

Cost-utility of an eHealth application 'Oncokompas' that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial.

Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice·2020
Same author

Randomized clinical trial of extended versus single-dose perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for acute calculous cholecystitis.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same journal

Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases: Current Indications, Controversies, and Future Directions.

Digestive surgery·2026
Same journal

Development of a basic robotic training course for residents in general surgery in the Netherlands.

Digestive surgery·2026
Same journal

Bacterial Colonization in Resected Lymph Nodes During Pancreatic Surgery - A Pilot Study.

Digestive surgery·2026
Same journal

Prognostic Significance of Nutritional and Inflammatory Factors in Gastric Cancer Surgery.

Digestive surgery·2026
Same journal

PIPAC for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Current Insights and Future Directions.

Digestive surgery·2026
Same journal

Low Preoperative Haemoglobin Is a Risk Factor for Clavien-Dindo Grade IV-V and Non-Surgical Complications in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Digestive surgery·2026
See all related articles

Removing a normal appendix during appendectomy for suspected appendicitis leads to significant complications and costs. Selective use of advanced diagnostic tools may help reduce unnecessary negative appendectomies.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical outcomes
  • Health economics
  • Diagnostic accuracy

Background:

  • Acute appendicitis diagnosis is challenging, resulting in 15-30% of removed appendices being normal.
  • Negative appendectomies contribute to patient morbidity and healthcare expenditure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the morbidity, mortality, and financial costs associated with removing a normal appendix in patients suspected of appendicitis.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent negative appendectomy between 1991-1999.
  • Exclusion of elective appendectomies and those for other indications.
  • Median follow-up of 4.4 years.

Main Results:

  • 285 patients (67% female) had a normal appendix removed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Complications occurred in 6% of patients, with 2% requiring re-operation.
  • Mean extra hospital costs for negative appendectomy were EUR 2712.

    • Conclusions:

    • Negative appendectomies incur substantial patient morbidity and significant financial costs.
    • Consideration of additional diagnostic tools is recommended to prevent unnecessary surgeries.
    • Selective use of expensive diagnostic methods like laparoscopy is crucial to manage costs.