Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Attachment categories as reflections of multiple dimensions: comment on Fraley and Spieker (2003)
1Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA. srouf001@umn.edu
Abstract:
Ainsworth's system of classifying patterns of attachment behavior has served the field well and will not be easily displaced--not because of a commitment by attachment researchers to the taxonomic status of these categories but rather because of difficulties lying in the way of a dimensional approach. Foremost among these is the large number of dimensions used in making classifications and the need to develop reliable scales to tap them. Other problems include the need to capture how behavior changes across age and across the episodes of the Strange Situation. Others will debate R.C. Fraley and S.J. Spieker's (2003) arguments concerning taxonomic status. However, whether taxa or not, Ainsworth's categories at the least have represented well the multidimensional space underlying attachment behavior in conditions of mild stress. Only when an alternative approach is demonstrated to predict (with equal power, in practice) the vast range of outcomes associated with Ainsworth's categories will it be a candidate for substitution.
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Understanding Self-Concept
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction
Framing Effects
