Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
[Early prehospital thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarct: a moral obligation?]
Stefano Coccolini1, Claudio Fresco, Paolo M Fioretti
1U.O. di Cardiologia, Ospedale S. Maria delle Croci, AUSL, Ravenna. dott_scoccolini@iol.it
Insights
Prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction significantly reduces mortality by enabling rapid treatment. Early intervention within the first hour saves lives by preserving heart muscle function.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Emergency Medical Services
- Pharmacology
Context:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of cardiovascular death, primarily caused by occlusive thrombosis of coronary arteries.
- Myocardial necrosis occurs rapidly after coronary artery occlusion, emphasizing the critical need for timely reperfusion.
- Current treatment focuses on minimizing delays to restore blood flow and preserve left ventricular function.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the safety and feasibility of prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- To assess the impact of reducing treatment delays on mortality rates in AMI patients.
- To identify optimal thrombolytic agents and diagnostic methods for prehospital settings.
Summary:
- Prehospital thrombolysis, facilitated by rapid on-site diagnosis using 12-lead electrocardiograms, significantly reduces treatment delays.
- Third-generation bolus thrombolytics like reteplase and tenecteplase have demonstrated safety and efficacy in large trials.
- Meta-analyses show substantial mortality reductions with early thrombolytic treatment, particularly within the first hour of symptom onset.
Impact:
- Reducing treatment delay by one hour saves approximately 20 lives per 1000 patients treated.
- Prehospital thrombolysis has proven safe and feasible, with electrocardiogram interpretation by emergency physicians or remote cardiologists.
- This strategy holds promise as a complementary component of future reperfusion strategies for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Abstract:
Acute myocardial infarction accounts for a large proportion of deaths from cardiovascular diseases. Occlusive thrombosis superimposed on a ruptured atheroma in an epicardial coronary artery is firmly established as the immediate cause of an acute myocardial infarction. Clinical research has focused on reducing the time to treatment, because necrosis of viable myocardial tissue mainly happens during the 30 to 90 min after coronary artery occlusion. Consequently, if the coronary artery can be reperfused during this period, extensive myocardial necrosis can be prevented and left ventricular function can be preserved. Indeed the mortality reduction by thrombolytic treatment compared with control is considerably higher in patients treated within 2 hours of symptom onset. Thrombolytic treatment during the first hour resulted in a 50% mortality reduction, which indicates 50 to 60 lives saved per 1000 patients treated. Early patency has crucial prognostic significance because the meta-analysis of all randomized trials of prehospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis shows that reducing treatment delay by 1 hour saves approximately 20 lives per 1000 patients treated. One way to reduce the delay is to bring the treatment to the patient in the prehospital setting. The safety and feasibility of prehospital thrombolysis strongly depend on the possibility of a rapid and correct diagnosis in the prehospital setting. To diagnose a myocardial infarction a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram is recorded and interpreted either on site by the emergency physician or, after telephone transmission, by a cardiologist on duty at the receiving coronary care unit. This approach has been proved to be safe. The most suitable prehospital thrombolytics are the third-generation agents given as a bolus, which have been tested in large hospital randomized control trials such as GUSTO-V and ASSENT III (reteplase and tenecteplase respectively), and the prehospital trial ASSENT III PLUS (tenecteplase). Hopefully future management of acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation will include prehospital thrombolysis as a complementary part of any reperfusion strategy.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care