Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Are statistical contributions to medicine undervalued?

Norman E Breslow¹

¹Department of Biostatistics, Box 357232, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7232, USA. norm@u.washington.edu

|May 24, 2003

Summary

Biostatistics and epidemiology are crucial for medical advancements but often overlooked for Nobel Prizes. Improving study design and transparent reporting can enhance their recognition and public trust.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Estimating the hazard rate difference from case-cohort studies.

European journal of epidemiology·2021

Same author

Reply to Wilms tumor and breast cancer.

Cancer·2015

Same author

Z-estimation and stratified samples: application to survival models.

Lifetime data analysis·2015

Same author

Breast cancer in female survivors of Wilms tumor: a report from the national Wilms tumor late effects study.

Cancer·2014

Same author

Individual prediction of heart failure among childhood cancer survivors.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2014

Same author

Using the Whole Cohort in the Analysis of Case-Control Data: Application to the Women's Health Initiative.

Statistics in biosciences·2013

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Causal Inference

Background:

Econometricians recognized with Nobel Prizes for discrete choice models and selection bias.
Epidemiology and biostatistics have made significant medical contributions, including case-control studies and causal inference.
Despite contributions, biostatistics and epidemiology are rarely awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

Discussion:

The public and some medical circles undervalue epidemiology and biostatistics.
Contradictory findings from observational studies contribute to the low esteem.
The "black box" approach in risk factor epidemiology lacks respect despite its life-saving efficacy.

Key Insights:

Nobel Prize recognition for biostatistics and epidemiology is historically limited.
Public perception is negatively influenced by inconsistent observational study results.
Ronald Ross is an exception, recognized for malaria vector discovery and epidemic theory.

Outlook:

Statisticians should adhere to rigorous study design and analysis protocols.
Conducting fewer, larger studies focused on specific hypotheses is recommended.
Integrating statistical findings with laboratory research and exercising caution in reporting results is crucial for improving perception.

Related Experiment Videos