Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The analysis of ring-recovery data using random effects.

S C Barry1, S P Brooks, E A Catchpole

  • 1Bureau of Rural Sciences, Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry Australia Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.

Biometrics
|May 24, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complex cognitive and motivational deficits precede motor dysfunction in the zQ175 (190 CAG repeat) Huntington's disease model.

Experimental neurology·2025
Same author

Preterm Birth Impacts the Timing and Excursion of Oropharyngeal Structures during Infant Feeding.

Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)·2020
Same author

Exact inference for integrated population modelling.

Biometrics·2019
Same author

Incorrect dosage of IQSEC2, a known intellectual disability and epilepsy gene, disrupts dendritic spine morphogenesis.

Translational psychiatry·2017
Same author

Point of truth calibration for disease prioritisation-A case study of prioritisation of exotic diseases for the pig industry in Australia.

Preventive veterinary medicine·2017
Same author

Ants and extrafloral nectaries: no evidence for plant protection in Helichrysum spp. - ant interactions.

Oecologia·2017
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Bayesian methods enhance mark-recovery models by incorporating random terms for yearly variation and overdispersion. This improves model fit and provides more accurate survival and population predictions, avoiding common statistical pitfalls.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Wildlife Biology

Background:

  • Mark-recovery data is crucial for estimating wildlife survival and population dynamics.
  • Traditional models may not adequately account for sources of variation like yearly changes and overdispersion.
  • Overdispersion can lead to inaccurate statistical inferences and biased predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the integration of random terms into mark-recovery models using Bayesian methods.
  • To improve the goodness of fit for models analyzing wildlife recovery data.
  • To address limitations in classical statistical approaches for handling overdispersion and yearly variations.

Main Methods:

  • Application of Bayesian statistical methods for mark-recovery data analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Incorporation of random effects to model yearly variation and overdispersion.
  • Model comparison using Bayesian p-values and the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC).

    • Main Results:

    • The inclusion of random terms significantly improved the goodness of fit for lapwing recovery data.
    • Omitting random terms led to overestimation of weather effects on survival.
    • Failure to account for random effects resulted in overly optimistic prediction intervals in population simulations.

    Conclusions:

    • Bayesian random effects models offer a superior approach to modeling overdispersion compared to classical methods.
    • Accurate modeling of variation is essential for reliable ecological inference and population forecasting.
    • This methodology enhances the robustness of mark-recovery analyses in wildlife research.