Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interrater reliability in pupillary measurement.

Michael D Witting1, Deepi Goyal

  • 1Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. mwitt001@umaryland.edu

Annals of Emergency Medicine
|May 24, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Pupil size measurements showed high agreement between different observers, especially in bright light, supporting previous findings on normal pupil size ranges. This confirms reliable pupillary measurement techniques.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Dunning‒Kruger effect in resident predicted and actual performance on the American Board of Emergency Medicine in-training examination.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open·2024
Same author

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With or Without Advanced Intervention for Massive Pulmonary Embolism.

Perfusion·2023
Same author

WHEN AND HOW TO USE ORTHOSTATIC VITAL SIGNS.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2022
Same author

Early Prediction of Intensive Care Admission in Emergency Department Patients With Asthma.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2022
Same author

Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Physician Performed Biparietal Diameter Estimate for Gestational Age.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2021
Same author

Emergency Department Asthma "Spacing Trials": Institutional Variability and Time Cost.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2020

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Clinical Measurement
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Previous research established normal pupil size ranges based on a principal investigator's measurements.
  • Assessing the reliability of pupillary measurements across different observers is crucial for consistent clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the interrater reliability of pupillary size measurements.
  • To determine if observer agreement in pupillary measurement is consistent across different light conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Healthy volunteers received phenylephrine or sterile water in one eye.
  • Pupil size was measured by the principal investigator and other observers under fluorescent and bright light using a modified Haab scale.
  • Interrater agreement was assessed for both direct measurement and gestalt judgment of pupillary dilation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No systematic difference was found in bright-light pupillary measurements between the principal investigator and other observers.
  • High agreement (85-86%) was observed between observers in judging pupillary dilation by measurement.
  • Observer agreement was higher for direct measurement (75-82%) than for gestalt judgment (61%) in diagnosing dilation.

Conclusions:

  • Bright-light pupillary measurements demonstrate high interrater reliability, supporting previously published normal pupil size ranges.
  • Measurement-based assessment of pupillary dilation shows strong agreement among observers, indicating a reliable method for clinical evaluation.