Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Random and systematic beam modulator errors in dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Homayon Parsai1, Paul S Cho, Mark H Phillips

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. hparsai@u.washington.edu

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|May 27, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of total body irradiation lung block parameters on lung doses using three-dimensional dosimetry.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2022
Same author

ACR-ASTRO Practice Parameter for Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT).

American journal of clinical oncology·2020
Same author

Ontologies in radiation oncology.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2020
Same author

Characterization of a Bayesian network-based radiotherapy plan verification model.

Medical physics·2019
Same author

Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Tasks and Tools: The Many Roles of Machine Learning.

Medical physics·2019
Same author

Applying Probabilistic Decision Models to Clinical Trial Design.

AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science·2018
Same journal

Effective contrast-enhanced preprocessing for intracranial artery segmentation in digital subtraction angiography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Improving Plan Quality in Adaptive Proton Therapy Using an Interactive Dose Modification Tool.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Fetus-Specific Hematopoietic Stem Cell Dosimetry Framework for Leukemia-Relevant Target Cells During Prenatal Development.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Random modulator errors in intensity modulated radiation therapy significantly reduce target dose and homogeneity. Even small systematic errors, around 0.5 mm, can cause substantial deviations in prescribed radiation doses.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Radiotherapy Physics

Background:

  • Dynamic intensity modulated beams are crucial in radiotherapy.
  • Modulator errors, both random and systematic, can impact treatment accuracy.
  • Understanding these errors is vital for patient safety and treatment efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the dosimetric consequences of random and systematic modulator errors in sliding-window intensity modulated radiation therapy.
  • To quantify the impact of multileaf collimator (MLC) and backup diaphragm positioning errors on dose delivery.
  • To evaluate these effects in a clinical scenario involving a clival meningioma.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated random positioning errors using Gaussian functions (0.5–1.5 mm standard deviation).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined a sliding-window delivery technique combining MLCs and backup diaphragms.
  • Performed dose calculations and analyzed dose-volume histograms for target and critical structures.

    • Main Results:

    • Random modulator errors significantly reduced minimum target dose and homogeneity.
    • Perturbations of 1 mm in MLCs and backup diaphragms led to 5% dose errors.
    • Individual perturbations of MLCs or diaphragms required 1.5 mm errors to exceed 5% dose discrepancy.
    • Systematic errors as small as +/- 0.5 mm caused significant dosimetric deviations.

    Conclusions:

    • Random modulator errors pose a considerable risk to target dose coverage and homogeneity in IMRT.
    • Systematic errors are particularly impactful, with small deviations causing significant dosimetric issues.
    • Robust quality assurance protocols are essential to mitigate the effects of modulator errors in radiotherapy.