Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Dose-response relationship for successful internal atrial defibrillation
Hung-Fat Tse1, Chu-Pak Lau, Gregory M Ayers
1Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China. hftse@hkucc.hku.hk
Insights
This study establishes the dose-response relationship for internal atrial defibrillation in humans, revealing significant differences between acute and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) for effective shock delivery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- The dose-response relationship for ventricular defibrillation is known, but not for atrial defibrillation in humans.
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects a significant portion of the population, necessitating effective treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the dose-response relationship for internal atrial defibrillation in human patients.
- To compare the efficacy of defibrillation for acute versus chronic AF.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-seven patients with acute or chronic AF underwent internal atrial defibrillation.
- Shock strength was incrementally increased, and success was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival and nonparametric probability analyses.
- Dose-response relationships were established, and shock intensities for specific conversion percentages (20-95%) were estimated.
Main Results:
- Significant dose-response relationships were found for both acute and chronic AF (P < 0.05).
- Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in dose-response relationships between acute and chronic AF (P < 0.001).
- Estimated shock intensity for 95% conversion was 279 V (2.9 J) for acute AF and 433 V (6.6 J) for chronic AF (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Single shock conversion data can effectively determine atrial defibrillation dose-response relationships.
- This relationship allows for the estimation of required shock intensities for specific efficacy levels.
- The findings highlight the impact of AF chronicity on defibrillation efficacy, informing treatment strategies.
Abstract:
The dose-response relationship for successful defibrillation has been determined in man for the ventricle but not for the atrium. The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-response relationship for internal atrial defibrillation in humans. Seventy-seven consecutive patients underwent internal atrial defibrillation for acute (n = 14) or chronic AF (n = 63). Shocks were delivered in 40-V increments between electrodes positioned in the coronary sinus and the right atrium until successful conversion or a maximum of 400 V was reached. The shock strength versus success of shock data were subjected to a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis combined with a nonparametric probability analysis to arrive at the dose-response relationship. Using this relationship, comparisons were made between acute and chronic AF and clinical relevant conversion percentages (20, 50, 80 and 95%) were estimated and were compared with the conventional mean threshold. There were significant dose-response relationships in both patients groups (P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing patients with chronic and acute AF showed significant differences in their dose-response relationships (P < 0.001). The estimated shock intensity for 95% conversion in patients with acute and chronic AF was 279 V (2.9 J) and 433 V (6.6 J), respectively (P < 0.001). The conventional mean defibrillation threshold in patients with acute (192 +/- 15 V. 1.4 +/- 0.2 J) and chronic AF (343 +/- 8 V, 4.4 +/- 0.2 J) predicted the 60% and 45% chance of successful conversion, respectively. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that single shock conversion data can be used to determine a dose-response relationship, which can be used to estimate the shock intensity required for specific successful atrial defibrillation efficacy and to compare different clinical factors that affect defibrillation efficacy.
Related Concept Videos
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

