Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

More "mapping" in brain mapping: statistical comparison of effects.

Terry L Jernigan1, Anthony C Gamst, Christine Fennema-Notestine

  • 1Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California 92093, USA. tjernigan@uscd.edu

Human Brain Mapping
|May 28, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Brain imaging maps often lack statistical comparison between brain regions, limiting spatial interpretation. Researchers should adopt new standards for comparing effect sizes across brain maps for valid spatial analysis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chronic pain as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease pathology: a longitudinal ADNI study.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2026
Same author

Prediction of cognitive performance by demographics, sleep, and brain morphometry: machine learning findings from ENIGMA-Sleep Working Group.

Research square·2026
Same author

Air pollution is linked to divergent cortical thickness patterns in brain regions vulnerable to Alzheimer's disease.

Neurotoxicology·2026
Same author

FEMA-Long: Modeling unstructured covariances for discovery of time-dependent effects in large-scale longitudinal datasets.

PLoS genetics·2026
Same author

Neighborhood disadvantage and cognitive function in older adults: The moderating role of young adult general cognitive ability.

Health & place·2026
Same author

From school climate to brain development: What the ABCD study reveals about the educational context of adolescence.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Brain Mapping

Background:

  • Conventional voxel-based brain maps often lack statistical comparison between regions.
  • Current analysis methods for functional neuroimaging data do not support inferences about spatial nonuniformity of effects.
  • Interpreting spatial patterns in brain maps is common but lacks rigorous statistical testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a new standard in brain imaging data presentation.
  • To enable valid interpretation of spatial patterns in brain maps.
  • To encourage statistical comparison of effect sizes across different brain regions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current practices in functional neuroimaging data analysis.
  • Discussion of the limitations of conventional voxel-based mapping.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proposal for a new data presentation standard requiring statistical comparison of effect sizes.

    • Main Results:

    • Current brain mapping analyses do not inherently support spatial localization inferences.
    • Significant activation in voxel-based maps supports inferences about the brain as a whole, not specific regions.
    • A lack of statistical comparison between voxels hinders the interpretation of spatial patterns.

    Conclusions:

    • A new standard for brain imaging data presentation is needed.
    • Investigators should present evidence of significant effect size differences between brain structures.
    • This will allow for more rigorous and valid interpretation of spatial patterns in brain maps.