Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes.

Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter1, Arno Kuhn

  • 1University of Göttingen, Waldweg 26, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany. isteffa@gwdg.de

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|May 29, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Flower-rich and diverse road verges support pollinators, but traffic speed limits the ecological benefits across Europe.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2026
Same author

Drought events reduce reproductive success of a long-tongued bumblebee species.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Temperature boosts and constrains dung beetle diversity along an Andean-Amazonian elevation gradient.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Limited thermal tolerance in tropical insects and its genomic signature.

Nature·2026
Same author

More than flowers: Habitat type, floral resources, and landscape context shape pollinator communities in villages.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2026
Same author

Synthesised database of wild bee and hoverfly records in Europe.

Scientific data·2026
Same journal

Effects of highly pathogenic avian influenza on the behaviour and survival of a colonial breeding seabird.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

A special feature highlighting impactful science from countries and regions underrepresented in Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Religious rituals in the United Kingdom and Brazil are associated with increased social bonding and pain threshold.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Limited evidence that reputation-based partner choice facilitates information sharing in humans.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomics resolves the century-old 'Zoraptera problem': Zoraptera as the earliest diverging lineage of Polyneoptera.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Paternal dietary macronutrients affect the seminal vesicle fluid proteome and fetal development: a geometric framework for nutrition study in mice.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Honeybee foraging distances varied by landscape complexity, with pollen collectors traveling farther in simple landscapes. Dancing activity was higher in complex landscapes, indicating bees adapt their communication to resource availability.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Landscape Ecology

Background:

  • Honeybee dances convey spatial information about food sources.
  • This information has been underutilized in foraging ecology studies.
  • Landscape structure's impact on honeybee foraging and communication is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze honeybee foraging distances and dance activity in relation to landscape structure.
  • To investigate the influence of season and colony on these behaviors.
  • To understand how landscape modification affects honeybee ecology and interactions.

Main Methods:

  • A replicated experimental approach on a landscape scale was employed.
  • Three simple and three complex landscapes were compared.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Observation hives were used to record and decode 1137 bee dances.

    • Main Results:

    • Overall mean foraging distance was 1526.1 m.
    • Nectar-collector foraging distances did not differ significantly between landscape types.
    • Pollen-collector foraging distances were significantly larger in simple landscapes.
    • Dancing activity was higher in complex landscapes.

    Conclusions:

    • Landscape complexity influences honeybee foraging strategies, particularly for pollen collection.
    • Increased dancing in complex landscapes suggests greater resource patch variability.
    • Findings enhance understanding of honeybee adaptation to landscape modifications and ecological roles.