Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis.

Clement W Imrie1

  • 1Royal Infirmary, 16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, Scotland G31 2ER, United Kingdom.

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology = Journal Canadien De Gastroenterologie
|May 29, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early antibiotic treatment for severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Annals of surgery·2007
Same author

Acute pancreatitis: bench to the bedside.

Gastroenterology·2007
Same author

Radiofrequency ablation has a valuable therapeutic role in metastatic VIPoma.

Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]·2005
Same author

Enteral and parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis.

Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology·2002

Predicting acute pancreatitis severity is crucial. Ranson, Glasgow, and APACHE II criteria, along with CT scans and organ failure scores, help assess prognosis and guide treatment for better patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of acute pancreatitis severity and prognosis is essential for effective patient management.
  • Several scoring systems and imaging techniques exist to aid in this prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and evaluate various methods for predicting acute pancreatitis severity and prognosis.
  • To identify the most reliable indicators of poor outcomes in acute pancreatitis.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established clinical criteria: Ranson and Glasgow criteria.
  • Evaluation of the Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) system.
  • Assessment of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) findings, specifically nonperfused areas.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the Marshall organ failure score and its persistence.

    • Main Results:

    • Ranson and Glasgow criteria are widely used, incorporating admission and 48-hour laboratory parameters.
    • APACHE II system, with a threshold score of eight for severe pancreatitis, is applicable in intensive care settings.
    • Nonperfused areas on CECT indicate pancreatic necrosis and an unfavorable prognosis.
    • Persistent Marshall organ failure score (≥2) beyond 36 hours is a critical predictor of early mortality.

    Conclusions:

    • While multiple indices exist, persistent organ dysfunction is a key predictor of early mortality in acute pancreatitis.
    • Radiological findings may not always correlate directly with organ dysfunction, necessitating further research.
    • Continued investigation is required to refine prognostic accuracy in acute pancreatitis.