Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MODFLOW 2000 head uncertainty, a first-order second moment method.

Harry S Glasgow1, Matthew D Fortney, Jejung Lee

  • 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.

Ground Water
|May 30, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Teach Me How to PyCap: A High-Capacity Well Decision Support Tool Using Analytical Solutions in Python.

Ground water·2026
Same author

A comprehensive review of urban microplastic pollution sources, environment and human health impacts, and regulatory efforts.

The Science of the total environment·2024
Same author

Evaluation of an Impulse-Response Emulator for Groundwater Contaminant Transport Modeling.

Ground water·2024
Same author

Effects of groundwater sample volume on identified microplastics in groundwater of an agricultural area in Korea.

The Science of the total environment·2023
Same author

SFRmaker and Linesink-Maker: Rapid Construction of Streamflow Routing Networks from Hydrography Data.

Ground water·2021
Same author

A Semi-Structured MODFLOW-USG Model to Evaluate Local Water Sources to Wells for Decision Support.

Ground water·2016
Same journal

Leaky Sewers Hydraulically Disconnect from Groundwater: A Proof-of-Concept.

Ground water·2026
Same journal

Python-Based Model Emulation Workflows with PEST.

Ground water·2026
Same journal

Hydrogeology in the Age of AI and Climate Change.

Ground water·2026
Same journal

Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage: Groundwater for Efficient Data Center Cooling in the United States.

Ground water·2026
Same journal

Simulating the Impacts of Deep Geothermal Development on Shallow Hydrothermal Resources in a Rocky Mountain Rift Valley.

Ground water·2026
Same journal

Discharge-Targeted Hydraulic Tomography to Quantify and Locate Aquifer Discharge.

Ground water·2026
See all related articles

This study presents an efficient method to estimate uncertainty in groundwater head predictions from MODFLOW 2000 models. The approach combines geological data uncertainty with model sensitivity for reliable hydrogeological assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Hydrogeology
  • Computational Hydrology
  • Geostatistics

Background:

  • Groundwater flow modeling is crucial for water resource management.
  • Estimating uncertainty in model outputs is essential for decision-making.
  • Existing methods for uncertainty quantification can be computationally intensive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computationally efficient method for estimating variance and covariance in MODFLOW 2000 piezometric head results.
  • To integrate uncertainty from geological data with model sensitivity using a first-order second moment (FOSM) approach.
  • To provide a framework for assessing the reliability of groundwater model predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized MODFLOW 2000 to compute groundwater head and model sensitivity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed a first-order Taylor series expansion to combine input uncertainty and model sensitivity.
  • Applied conditional probability calculations to extrapolate geological data and compute uncertainties.
  • Constructed a variance-covariance matrix from spatially related sensitivity and input uncertainty.

    • Main Results:

    • The diagonal of the variance-covariance matrix yields the standard deviation in MODFLOW 2000 head.
    • Demonstrated applicability for spatially related input/output data and multiple parameters (transmissivity, recharge).
    • A case study using aquifer transmissivity uncertainty validated the FOSM approach.

    Conclusions:

    • The FOSM methodology provides an efficient way to quantify uncertainty in piezometric head.
    • Estimated variance in piezometric head is valuable for model calibration, confidence intervals, and design evaluation.
    • The method is robust for handling spatially variable hydrogeological parameters and multiple sources of uncertainty.