Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.

Renxiao Wang1, Yipin Lu, Shaomeng Wang

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109-0934, USA.

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
|May 30, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Eleven scoring functions were evaluated for protein-ligand complex structures and binding affinities. Consensus scoring improved accuracy, with X-Score and DrugScore showing promise for energy surface construction.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Phenylpyrrole Derivatives as Small-Molecule Activators of BAX.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Combined Nudged Elastic Band and Markov State Models Uncover Distinct BAX Activation Pathways by Bim Peptide and a Small Molecule.

JACS Au·2026
Same author

COMET: A Machine-Learning Framework Integrating Ligand-Based and Target-Based Algorithms for Elucidating Drug Targets.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2025
Same author

Bioorthogonal Photocatalytic Protein Labeling and Cross-Linking Enabled by Stabilized Ketyl Radicals.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2025
Same author

PPAP: A Protein-protein Affinity Predictor Incorporating Interfacial Contact-Aware Attention.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

ThermoSeek: An Integrated Web Resource for Sequence and Structural Analysis of Proteins from Thermophilic Species.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Structural Biology
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Scoring functions are crucial for predicting protein-ligand interactions in drug discovery.
  • Evaluating the performance of existing scoring functions is essential for improving molecular docking accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of eleven popular scoring functions in reproducing experimentally determined protein-ligand complex structures and binding affinities.
  • To compare the performance of scoring functions when conformational sampling and scoring are separated.

Main Methods:

  • Thorough conformational sampling using AutoDock for 100 protein-ligand complexes.
  • Application of eleven distinct scoring functions (LigScore, PLP, PMF, LUDI, F-Score, G-Score, D-Score, ChemScore, AutoDock, DrugScore, X-Score) to the generated conformational ensembles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of scoring accuracy based on reproducing experimentally observed conformations and predicting binding affinities.

    • Main Results:

    • Six scoring functions (PLP, F-Score, LigScore, DrugScore, LUDI, X-Score) achieved success rates of 66-76% in identifying correct conformations.
    • Consensus scoring using combinations of these functions improved success rates to nearly 80%.
    • X-Score, PLP, DrugScore, and G-Score showed moderate success (correlation coefficients > 0.50) in predicting binding affinities.
    • X-Score and DrugScore demonstrated superior performance in constructing funnel-shaped energy surfaces for protein-ligand complexation.

    Conclusions:

    • Individual scoring functions show variable performance in structure and affinity prediction.
    • Consensus scoring strategies can enhance the accuracy of identifying correct protein-ligand conformations.
    • X-Score and DrugScore exhibit promising characteristics for future development in protein-ligand interaction modeling.