Is cyclosporine withdrawal a therapeutic option in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft dysfunction?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
1Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, CHU Saint Jacques, Besançon, France. ducloux@chu-besancon.fr
Abstract:
Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), the leading cause of graft loss, is due to both immunologic and non-immunologic factors. Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is supposed to significantly contribute to CAN. It has been suggested recently that new commercially available immunosuppressive drugs, such as Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and Sirolimus (SRL), may have properties that may prevent and possibly partly reverse chronic rejection, the alloantigen-dependent immune process of CAN. Thus, our group and others have studied the efficiency of a 2-step therapeutic approach including CsA withdrawal and use of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive drugs with properties against chronic rejection, such as MMF or SRL. In this review, we will successively analyze how mechanisms of CsA-related nephrotoxicity, histopathologic findings in CAN, animal models and clinical studies justify this therapeutic approach.
Insights
Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is linked to cyclosporine (CsA) toxicity. Switching to Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) or Sirolimus (SRL) may help reverse chronic rejection and improve graft survival.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Immunology
- Transplantation
Background:
- Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the primary cause of kidney transplant failure.
- Both immunologic and non-immunologic factors contribute to CAN.
- Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is a significant factor in CAN development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence supporting a therapeutic approach for CAN.
- To analyze the mechanisms of CsA nephrotoxicity and its role in CAN.
- To evaluate the potential of alternative immunosuppressants like MMF and SRL in managing CAN.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on CsA nephrotoxicity.
- Analysis of histopathologic findings in CAN.
- Examination of animal models and clinical studies investigating MMF and SRL for CAN.
Main Results:
- CsA contributes to CAN through nephrotoxicity.
- Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and Sirolimus (SRL) show potential in preventing and reversing chronic rejection.
- A two-step approach involving CsA withdrawal and MMF/SRL use is supported by evidence.
Conclusions:
- Switching from CsA to MMF or SRL may mitigate CAN.
- Alternative immunosuppressants offer a promising strategy for managing chronic kidney transplant rejection.
- Further research and clinical application of this therapeutic approach are warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
