Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethics for all: differences across scientific society codes.

Merry Bullock1, Sangeeta Panicker

  • 1American Psychological Association, 750 First St. N.E., Washington, D.C. 20002-4242, USA. mbullock@apa.org

Science and Engineering Ethics
|May 31, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical challenges in the use of digital technologies in psychological science: Introduction to the special issue.

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Psychology and human rights-introduction to the special issue.

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie·2023
Same author

Ethical aspects of data sharing and research participant protections.

The American psychologist·2018
Same author

Broader impacts: international implications and integrative ethical consideration of policy decisions about US chimpanzee research.

American journal of primatology·2016
Same author

The importance of animals in advancing research on alcohol use disorders.

Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research·2015
Same author

Caregiver behavior change for child survival and development in low- and middle-income countries: an examination of the evidence.

Journal of health communication·2014
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Scientific societies

Area of Science:

  • Ethics in scientific research
  • Professional conduct standards

Background:

  • Scientific societies establish ethical standards for research and professional activities.
  • These codes guide responsible conduct across various disciplines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare ethics codes across disciplines on key dimensions.
  • Analyze the scope, specificity, and purpose (educational, aspirational, regulatory) of these codes.
  • Examine the role of professional associations in member oversight.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of ethics codes from multiple scientific societies.
  • Evaluation based on coverage of research, service/practice, and teaching.
  • Assessment of code characteristics: range, specificity, educational, aspirational, and regulatory intent.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified variations in the scope and specificity of ethical guidelines.
  • Observed differences in the primary purpose (educational vs. regulatory) of codes.
  • Highlighted the multifaceted role of professional associations in upholding ethical standards.

Conclusions:

  • Ethics codes provide a framework for responsible scientific conduct.
  • Professional associations play a crucial role in educating, regulating, and sanctioning members.
  • Understanding code variations informs best practices in research ethics.