Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Co-responsibility for research integrity.

Carl Mitcham1

  • 1Liberal Arts & International Studies, Stratton Hall 301, 1005 14th Street, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA. cmitcham@mines.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics
|May 31, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What Western Philosophers of Technology Might Learn from Li Bocong's Philosophy of Engineering.

Science and engineering ethics·2024
Same author

Zero-COVID Editorial lacks balance.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2022
Same author

Taking Responsible Innovation to China: The Dalian Port Development Case.

Science and engineering ethics·2022
Same author

Enhancing Engineering Ethics: Role Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility.

Science and engineering ethics·2021
Same author

Prudently conduct the engineering and synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Synthetic and systems biotechnology·2020
Same author

Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics.

Science and engineering ethics·2016
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Scientific responsibility for research integrity is rediscovered through role responsibility, evolving from collective duties to a trans-scientific community. This highlights the need for co-responsibility in the science-society relationship.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Ethics in Science
  • Sociology of Science

Background:

  • Modern ethics often prioritizes abstract principles over social role responsibility.
  • Discussions on research integrity within science reveal a resurgence of role responsibility.
  • The concept of scientific responsibility has evolved significantly over time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the historico-philosophical underpinnings of scientific responsibility for research integrity.
  • To analyze the evolution of role responsibility in the scientific community.
  • To propose a framework for co-responsibility in the science-society relationship.

Main Methods:

  • Historico-philosophical analysis of ethical and scientific discourse.
  • Examination of the evolution of concepts like 'collective responsibility' and 'trans-scientific community'.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual analysis of the relationship between scientific integrity and societal engagement.

    • Main Results:

    • Modern ethics' shift to abstract principles contrasts with science's rediscovery of role responsibility.
    • Role responsibility in science has evolved from 'collective responsibility' to a 'trans-scientific community' model.
    • Challenges persist in linking scientific role responsibility to the broader science-society dynamic.

    Conclusions:

    • The scientific community's focus on research integrity represents a vital rediscovery of role responsibility.
    • Further development is needed to integrate scientific role responsibility with societal interactions.
    • A concept of 'co-responsibility' can foster integrity within both science and its relationship with society.