Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs.

Ulrich Mayr1, Reinhold Kliegl

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403, USA. mayr@darkwing.uoregon.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|June 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medicine ball throw distance weighted with height-to-mass ratio aligns with other physical fitness tasks.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Case Report: Severe sepsis due to imported scrub typhus in a German traveler returning from Vietnam.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Pausing to breathe and the speech-language relationship in production.

Journal of memory and language·2026
Same author

Risk of intracranial hemorrhage in critically ill ACLF patients: a retrospective single center cohort study.

BMC gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Emotional tone distorts remembered durations of naturalistic activities.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Switching between certainty and uncertainty: General and age-related dynamics of seeking environmental support.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals task-switching involves distinct cue-driven rule retrieval and automatic rule application stages. Cue changes significantly impact switch costs, influenced by practice and preparation, unlike task-switch costs.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Task-switching research investigates cognitive control and executive functions.
  • Understanding the distinct components of switch costs is crucial for elucidating cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between cue-switching and task-switching processes.
  • To identify factors influencing these distinct switching costs.
  • To propose a dual-stage model of task-set selection.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a task-switching paradigm with a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping.
  • Analyzed pure cue-switch costs and additional costs from cue and task changes.
  • Investigated effects of practice, preparation, response priming, and task-set inhibition across three experiments.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Cue changes accounted for a substantial portion of total switch costs.
  • Cue-switch costs were sensitive to practice and preparation, unlike task-switch costs.
  • Task-switch costs were influenced by response-priming effects and task-set inhibition.

Conclusions:

  • Task-switching involves at least two distinct processing stages.
  • The first stage is cue-driven retrieval of task rules from long-term memory.
  • The second stage is the automatic application of retrieved rules to stimuli.