Related Experiment Videos
Osteopathic manipulative treatment techniques preferred by contemporary osteopathic physicians
Shirley M Johnson1, Margot E Kurtz
1Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine's, Department of Family and Community Medicine, B211B West Fee Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association
|June 5, 2003
Summary
Osteopathic physicians
Area of Science:
- Osteopathic Medicine
- Musculoskeletal Medicine
Background:
- Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) encompasses diverse techniques.
- Understanding current OMT usage patterns is crucial for education and research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the likelihood and frequency of use of eleven specific OMT techniques among osteopathic physicians.
- To investigate the relationship between physician demographics and OMT technique selection.
Main Methods:
- National mail survey of 3000 osteopathic physicians, with 955 usable responses.
- Assessed the usage frequency of eleven OMT techniques, categorizing them by direct, indirect, or direct-indirect approaches.
- Analyzed demographic variables (gender, age, specialty) in relation to OMT technique preference.
Main Results:
- Soft tissue techniques were most frequently used, while cranial techniques were least used.
- Physicians favored direct OMT techniques over indirect ones.
- Gender and age influenced technique preference: females and older physicians preferred indirect techniques, while males and younger physicians preferred direct techniques.
- OMT specialists utilized a wider range of techniques; family physicians were more likely to use high-velocity low-amplitude thrust.
Conclusions:
- Demographic factors significantly influence OMT technique selection among osteopathic physicians.
- Findings have implications for optimizing osteopathic medical education curricula and guiding future research on OMT effectiveness.
- Specific OMT techniques show varying adoption rates based on physician characteristics and specialty.